Cleanup/Perf: Float32Array/Float64Array removal (#5877)

## Summary

Redoing https://github.com/Comfy-Org/ComfyUI_frontend/pull/5567, without
the link rendering changes.

## Changes

- **What**: Standardizing the Point/Size/Rect logic around numeric
tuples instead of typed arrays.

## Review Focus

Cutting here and going to continue in a second PR.

Do the simpler types make sense?
Do we want to keep the behavior of Rectangle as it is now?

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5877-WIP-Float32Array-Float64Array-removal-27f6d73d36508169a39eff1e4a87a61c)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: filtered <176114999+webfiltered@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com>

src/lib/litegraph/src/infrastructure/ConstrainedSize.ts

@@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
 import { clamp } from 'es-toolkit/compat'
 
-import type {
-  ReadOnlyRect,
-  ReadOnlySize,
-  Size
-} from '@/lib/litegraph/src/interfaces'
+import type { ReadOnlyRect, Size } from '@/lib/litegraph/src/interfaces'
 
 /**
  * Basic width and height, with min/max constraints.
@@ -55,7 +51,7 @@ export class ConstrainedSize {
     this.desiredHeight = height
   }
 
-  static fromSize(size: ReadOnlySize): ConstrainedSize {
+  static fromSize(size: Readonly<Size>): ConstrainedSize {
     return new ConstrainedSize(size[0], size[1])
   }
 
@@ -63,7 +59,7 @@ export class ConstrainedSize {
     return new ConstrainedSize(rect[2], rect[3])
   }
 
-  setSize(size: ReadOnlySize): void {
+  setSize(size: Readonly<Size>): void {
     this.desiredWidth = size[0]
     this.desiredHeight = size[1]
   }