Commit Graph

21 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Arthur R Longbottom
657ae6a6c3 fix: subgraph promoted widget input label rename (#10195)
## Summary

Promoted primitive subgraph inputs (String, Int) render their link
anchor at the header position instead of the widget row. Renaming
subgraph input labels breaks the match entirely, causing connections to
detach from their widgets visually.

## Changes

- **What**: Fix widget-input slot positioning for promoted subgraph
inputs in both LiteGraph and Vue (Nodes 2.0) rendering modes
- `_arrangeWidgetInputSlots`: Removed Vue mode branch that skipped
setting `input.pos`. Promoted widget inputs aren't rendered as
`<InputSlot>` Vue components (NodeSlots filters them out), so
`input.pos` is the only position fallback
- `drawConnections`: Added pre-pass to arrange nodes with unpositioned
widget-input slots before link rendering. The background canvas renders
before the foreground canvas calls `arrange()`, so positions weren't set
on the first frame
- `SubgraphNode`: Sync `input.widget.name` with the display name on
label rename and initial setup. The `IWidgetLocator` name diverged from
`PromotedWidgetView.name` after rename, breaking all name-based
slot↔widget matching (`_arrangeWidgetInputSlots`, `getWidgetFromSlot`,
`getSlotFromWidget`)

## Review Focus

- The `_arrangeWidgetInputSlots` rewrite iterates `_concreteInputs`
directly instead of building a spread-copy map — simpler and avoids the
stale index issue
- `input.widget.name` is now kept in sync with the display name
(`input.label ?? subgraphInput.name`). This is a semantic shift from
using the raw internal name, but it's required for all name-based
matching to work after renames. The value is overwritten on deserialize
by `_setWidget` anyway
- The `_widget` fallback in `_arrangeWidgetInputSlots` is a safety net
for edge cases where the name still doesn't match (e.g., stale cache)

Fixes #9998

## Screenshots
<img width="847" height="476" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-17 at 3 05 32 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/38f10563-f0bc-44dd-a1a5-f4a7832575d0"
/>
<img width="804" height="471" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-17 at 3 05 23 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3237a7ee-f3e5-4084-b330-371def3415bd"
/>
<img width="974" height="571" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-17 at 3 05 16 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cafdca46-8d9b-40e1-8561-02cbb25ee8f2"
/>
<img width="967" height="558" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-17 at 3 05 06 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fc03ce43-906c-474d-b3bc-ddf08eb37c75"
/>


┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-10195-fix-subgraph-promoted-widget-input-slot-positions-after-label-rename-3266d73d365081dfa623dd94dd87c718)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: jaeone94 <jaeone.prt@gmail.com>
2026-03-23 14:33:03 -07:00
Alexander Brown
1280d4110d fix: simplify ensureCorrectLayoutScale and fix link sync during Vue node drag (#9680)
## Summary

Fix node layout drift from repeated `ensureCorrectLayoutScale` scaling,
simplify it to a pure one-time normalizer, and fix links not following
Vue nodes during drag.

## Changes

- **What**:
- `ensureCorrectLayoutScale` simplified to a one-time normalizer:
unprojects legacy Vue-scaled coordinates back to canonical LiteGraph
coordinates, marks the graph as corrected, and does nothing else. No
longer touches the layout store, syncs reroutes, or changes canvas
scale.
- Removed no-op calls from `useVueNodeLifecycle.ts` (a renderer version
string was passed where an `LGraph` was expected).
- `layoutStore.finalizeOperation` now calls `notifyChange` synchronously
instead of via `setTimeout`. This ensures `useLayoutSync`'s `onChange`
callback pushes positions to LiteGraph `node.pos` and calls
`canvas.setDirty()` within the same RAF frame as a drag update, fixing
links not following Vue nodes during drag.
- **Tests**: Added tests for `ensureCorrectLayoutScale` (idempotency,
round-trip, unknown-renderer no-op) and `graphRenderTransform`
(project/unproject round-trips, anchor caching).

## Review Focus

- The `setTimeout(() => this.notifyChange(change), 0)` →
`this.notifyChange(change)` change in `layoutStore.ts` is the key fix
for the drag-link-sync bug. The listener (`useLayoutSync`) only writes
to LiteGraph, not back to the layout store, so synchronous notification
is safe.
- `ensureCorrectLayoutScale` no longer has any side effects beyond
normalizing coordinates and setting `workflowRendererVersion` metadata.

---------

Co-authored-by: Amp <amp@ampcode.com>
Co-authored-by: Christian Byrne <cbyrne@comfy.org>
Co-authored-by: jaeone94 <89377375+jaeone94@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: AustinMroz <austin@comfy.org>
Co-authored-by: Hunter <huntcsg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com>
2026-03-13 08:43:18 -07:00
Terry Jia
17c1b1f989 fix: prevent node height shrinking on vueNodes/litegraph mode switch (#8697)
## Summary
Three interacting bugs caused cumulative height loss (~66px per cycle):

1. useVueNodeLifecycle incorrectly subtracted NODE_TITLE_HEIGHT from
LGraphNode.size[1] during layout init, but size[1] is already
content-only (title excluded per LGraphNode.measure()).

2. ensureCorrectLayoutScale added/subtracted NODE_TITLE_HEIGHT in scale
formulas, breaking the round-trip.
Simplified to pure ratio scaling (size * scaleFactor). 
Also set LayoutSource.Canvas before batchUpdateNodeBounds to prevent
stale DOM source from triggering incorrect height normalization.

3. initSizeStyles set --node-height (min-height of the full DOM element
including title) to the content-only layout height.
Added NODE_TITLE_HEIGHT so ResizeObserver captures the correct total
height and normalization recovers the exact content height.

## Screenshots (if applicable)
before

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ae41124b-f9e3-4061-8127-eeacddc67a55

after

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ff288a6-73a3-481a-a750-150d9bdbc8fe

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-8697-fix-prevent-node-height-shrinking-on-vueNodes-litegraph-mode-switch-2ff6d73d365081c7a2acdc7ec57e2e19)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com>
2026-02-06 12:52:13 -08:00
Alexander Brown
03e9dd4789 Feat: Remove the Nodes 2.0 Trial Banner (#7390)
## Summary

The option to try it out is still in the Menu if you're looking for it.

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-7390-Feat-Remove-the-Nodes-2-0-Trial-Banner-2c66d73d365081c3817ad5c89dd4029b)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com>
2025-12-11 17:13:26 -08:00
Christian Byrne
29dbfa3f60 fix: Vue Node <-> Litegraph node height offset normalization (#6966)
## Summary

Changes the layout store to treat node sizes as body-only measurements
while LiteGraph continues to reason about full heights. DOM-driven
updates are tagged with `LayoutSource.DOM`, which lets the store strip
the title height exactly once before persisting. That classification (a
new mutation source - `LayoutSource.DOM`) is accurate because those
mutations are triggered by the browser’s layout engine via
ResizeObserver, rather than by direct calls into the layout APIs (e.g.,
`moveNodeTo`, `useNodeDrag`). So all sources are:

- `LayoutSource.DOM`: browser layout/ResizeObserver measurements that
include the title bar
- `LayoutSource.Vue`: direct Vue-driven mutations routed through the
layout store
- `LayoutSource.Canvas`: legacy LiteGraph/canvas updates that will be
phased out over time
- `LayoutSource.External`: for multiplayer or syncing with a when going
online after making changes offline (in teams/workspace)

When layout state flows back into LiteGraph we add the title height just
in time for `liteNode.setSize`, so LiteGraph’s rendering stays
unchanged. This makes Vue node resizing and workflow persistence
deterministic - multiline widgets hold their dimensions across reloads
because every path that crosses the layout/LiteGraph boundary performs
the same normalization.

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-6966-normalize-height-at-sites-2b76d73d365081b6bcb4f4ce6a27663a)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com>
2025-11-26 17:37:24 -07:00
Simula_r
4b87b1fdc5 fix: remove LOD from vue nodes (#6950)
## Summary

Refactor to remove LOD from vue nodes. Also, hide Litegraph LOD settings
in vue nodes to prevent confusion / stale setting. Keep litegraph LOD
the exact same.

## Changes

- **What**: settings, all LOD related code in vue nodes

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-6950-fix-remove-LOD-from-vue-nodes-2b76d73d365081568723f8cbc7be7e17)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com>
2025-11-26 12:26:05 -07:00
Simula_r
38fb53dca8 feat: LOD setting for LG and Vue (#6755)
## Summary

Create a composable for useRenderModeSetting that lets you set a setting
for either vue or litegraph and once set remembers each state
respectively.

```
  useRenderModeSetting(
    { setting: 'LiteGraph.Canvas.MinFontSizeForLOD', vue: 0, litegraph: 8 },
    shouldRenderVueNodes
  )
```

## Screenshots (if applicable)

<img width="1611" height="997" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/621930f2-2d21-4c86-a46d-e3e292d4e012"
/>
<img width="1611" height="997" alt="chrome_Gr1V3P6sJi"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eb63b747-487f-4f5e-8fcf-f0d2ff97b976"
/>

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-6755-feat-LOD-setting-for-LG-and-Vue-2b16d73d365081cbbf09c292ee3c0e96)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
2025-11-19 18:49:58 -08:00
Simula_r
ecd87ae0f4 feat: vue nodes onboarding toggle in menu (#6671)
## Summary

Added Nodes 2.0 menu items with a toggle. 
Updated copy in banner and toast to be more descriptive.

## Screenshots (if applicable)


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/85bf3ae4-0e0b-4e04-82c7-a26a73cbdd5b

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-6671-feat-vue-nodes-onboarding-toggle-in-menu-2aa6d73d3650817d8e5bef0ad0f8bebb)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com>
2025-11-13 20:19:18 -08:00
Simula_r
bbfada561e Fix/vue nodes auto scale (#6664)
## Summary

**Problem:** ensureCorrectLayoutScale scales up LG -> Vue. But doesn't
scale down from Vue -> LG.

**Solution:** Bi directional scaling.

**Bonus:** fix edge cases such as subgraphs, groups, and reroutes. Also,
set auto scale: true now that we 'preserve' LG scale.

**IMPORTANT:** useVueNodeResizeTracking.ts sets vue node height -
Litegraph.NODE_TITLE_HEIGHT on workflow load using a resize observer.
Reloading the page (loading a workflow) in Vue mode, will subtract
height each time. This can look like a problem caused by
ensureCorrectLayoutScale. It is not. Need to fix. Here was an attempt by
[removing the Litegraph.NODE_TITLE_HEIGHT
entirely](https://github.com/Comfy-Org/ComfyUI_frontend/pull/6643).

## Review Focus

Full lifecycle of loading workflows and switching between vue and lg.
Race conditions could be present. For example switching the mode using
keybind very fast.

## Screenshots (if applicable)


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5576b760-13a8-45b9-b8f7-64e1caf443c1



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/46d6f870-df76-4084-968a-53cb629fc123

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com>
2025-11-12 17:44:08 -07:00
Simula_r
9e309308ed feat: show vue node settings toggle and show banner to switch back (#6382)
## Summary

- When switching from litegraph to vue nodes, show a toast that opens
settings to switch back
- Show a toggle in settings under Vue nodes for now called Modern Node
Design (Vue Nodes)
- Plan to update all the nomenclature as we get closer to GA

## Screenshots (if applicable)

<img width="1480" height="911" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fa3a34b9-2631-4175-917a-aa319f9fe415"
/>

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-6382-feat-show-vue-node-settings-toggle-and-show-banner-to-switch-back-29b6d73d365081d29252c83349f06c0a)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com>
2025-10-29 22:39:52 -07:00
Simula_r
133662cdc7 Feat/vue noes arrange alg improved (#6357)
## Summary

Improve the previous [vue node arrange
alg](5a1284660c/src/renderer/extensions/vueNodes/layout/scaleLayoutForVueNodes.ts)
to match Litegraph much closer visually.

- In addition to the scaling of the LG node's x,y and then setting the
vue nodes position to that, we can also scale the width and height of
the LG node and set that for the Vue node wxh.
- Change from scaling from the center to the top left
- Change the zoom offset to account for the scale for seamless
transition

## Screenshots (if applicable)

<img width="1868" height="1646" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bc816819-211f-4619-a02a-8d167b5dc1fd"
/>

<img width="1868" height="1648" alt="image (1)"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/61faf530-1994-4cf9-bca9-a7ab6f9740c2"
/>

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-6357-Feat-vue-noes-arrange-alg-improved-29b6d73d365081e7813bd6f19ce1202a)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com>
Co-authored-by: JakeSchroeder <jake@axiom.co>
2025-10-28 20:23:23 -07:00
Simula_r
f629d325b2 Feat/vue nodes arrange alg (#6212)
## Summary

### Problem: 
The Vue nodes renderer/feature introduces new designs for each node i.e.
the equivalent Litegraph node design is smaller and the vue node design
is non uniformly larger.

### Example: 

Litegraph Ksampler node: 200w x 220h

<img width="200" height="220" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eef0117b-7e02-407d-98ab-c610fd1ec54c"
/>

Vue Node Ksampler node: 445w x 430h 

<img width="445" height="430" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e78d9d45-5b32-4e8d-bf1c-bce1c699037f"
/>

This means if users load a workflow in Litegraph and then switches to
Vue nodes renderer the nodes are using the same Litegraph positions
which would cause a visual overlap and overall look broken.

### Example:

<img width="1510" height="726" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3b7ae9d2-6057-49b2-968e-c531a969fac4"
/>
<img width="1475" height="850" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ea10f361-09bd-4daa-97f1-6b45b5dde389"
/>

### Solution:

Scale the positions of the nodes in lite graph radially from the center
of the bounds of all nodes. And then simply move the Vue nodes to those
new positions.

1. Get the `center of the bounds of all LG nodes`.
2. Get the `xy of each LG node`.
3. Get the vector from `center of the bounds of all LG nodes` `-` `xy of
each LG node`.
4. Scale it by a factor (e.g. 1.75x which is the average Vue node size
increase plus some visual padding.)
5. Move each Vue node to the scaled `xy of each LG node`. 

Result: The nodes are spaced apart removing overlaps while keeping the
spatial layout intact.

<img width="2173" height="1096" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7817d866-4051-47bb-a589-69ca77a0bfd3"
/>

### Further concerns.

This vector scaling algorithm needs to run once per workflow when in vue
nodes. This means when in Litegraph and switching to Vue nodes, it needs
to run before the nodes render. And then now that the entire app is in
vue nodes, we need to run it each time we load a workflow. However, once
its run, we do not need to run it again. Therefore we must persist a
flag that it has run somewhere. This PR also adds that feature by
leveraging the `extra` field in the workflow schema.

---------

Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com>
Co-authored-by: JakeSchroeder <jake@axiom.co>
2025-10-28 14:14:39 -07:00
Alexander Brown
6afdb9529d Fix: Vue-Litegraph conversion bug with Reroutes (#6330)
## Summary

The private fields triggered an error in intitializing the
linkLayoutSync. Turns out that wasn't necessary anymore.

> [!NOTE]
> Edit: Doing some more investigation, it looks like the slot sync can
also be removed?

## Changes

- **What**: Converts JS private fields to typescript private, adds some
readonly declarations
- **What**: Removes the useLinkLayoutSync usage in useVueNodeLifecycle
- **What**: Removes the useSlotLayoutSync usage in useVueNodeLifecycle

## Review Focus

Was the sync doing something that wouldn't be caught in normal
usage/testing?

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-6330-Fix-Vue-Litegraph-conversion-bug-with-Reroutes-2996d73d3650819ebb24e4aa2fc51c65)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
2025-10-27 19:36:19 -07:00
Simula_r
893621265c fix: node deletion handling in vue nodes when switching from litegrap… (#5909)
## Summary

Fix node deletion when switching from litegraph -> vue node mode. 

## Background:
 
There is a race condition where we have [2 watch() functions that are
both tracking
shouldRenderVueNodes.value](f58365b20b/src/composables/graph/useVueNodeLifecycle.ts (L85)):
  - For vue node lifecycle
  - For slot/link sync lifecycle

Each watch() separately sets graph.onNodeRemoved to its own cleanup
handler. But without flush: 'sync', the slot sync watch runs AFTER vue
nodes and overwrites the callback. So when deletion happens,
graph.onNodeRemoved points to the slot handler (or undefined) instead of
the vue cleanup handler, and the vue node never gets removed from the
DOM.

## Review Focus
We are making use of the watch() option "fush: sync" in the link and
slot watch() so maybe there is side effects from firing this when
dependencies change synchronously.

## Screenshots (if applicable)


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6951fa50-61d5-4c63-88e9-e113f603ff77


┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5909-fix-node-deletion-handling-in-vue-nodes-when-switching-from-litegrap-2826d73d365081bdba35c3d8728d6251)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com>
2025-10-06 23:51:20 -07:00
Alexander Brown
840f7f04fa Cleanup: Litegraph/Vue synchronization work (#5789)
## Summary

Cleanup and fixes to the existing syncing logic.

## Review Focus

This is probably enough to review and test now.

Main things that should still work: 
- moving nodes around
- adding new ones
- switching back and forth between Vue and Litegraph

Let me know if you find any bugs that weren't already present there.

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5789-WIP-Litegraph-Vue-synchronization-work-27a6d73d3650811682cacacb82367b9e)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
2025-09-27 16:01:59 -07:00
Alexander Brown
1611c7a224 Refactor: Further state management cleanup (#5727)
## Summary

Going through the GraphNodeManager and VueNodeLifecycle one property at
a time and removing the pieces that are not currently wired up or used
by the rest of the application

Fixes paste location by updating the layoutStore in LGraphCanvas (which
already mutates layoutStore elsewhere)

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5727-WIP-Refactor-Further-state-management-cleanup-2766d73d36508173b379c6009c194a5a)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
2025-09-22 18:47:26 -07:00
Alexander Brown
e5d4d07d32 Refactor: More state management simplification (#5721)
## Summary

Remove more procedural synchronization in favor of using reactive
references.

> Note: Also includes some fixes for issues caused during HMR.

## Review Focus

In testing it seems to work the same, but let me know if I missed
something.

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5721-Refactor-More-state-management-simplification-2766d73d3650819b8d7ddc047c460f2b)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
2025-09-22 13:15:33 -07:00
Alexander Brown
8133bd4b7b Refactor: Composable disentangling (#5695)
## Summary

Prerequisite refactor/cleanup to use a global store instead of having
nodes throw up events to a parent component that stores a reference to a
singleton service that itself bootstraps and synchronizes with a
separate service to maintain a partially reactive but not fully reactive
set of states that describe some but not all aspects of the nodes on
either the litegraph, the vue side, or both.

## Changes

- **What**: Refactoring, the behavior should not change.
- **Dependencies**: A type utility to help with Vue component props

## Review Focus

Is there something about the current structure that this could affect
that would not be caught by our tests or using the application?

┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5695-Refactor-Composable-disentangling-2746d73d365081e6938ce656932f3e36)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
2025-09-20 13:06:42 -07:00
Christian Byrne
0801778f60 feat: Add Vue node subgraph title button and fix subgraph navigation with vue nodes (#5572)
## Summary
- Adds subgraph title button to Vue node headers (matching LiteGraph
behavior)
- Fixes Vue node lifecycle issues during subgraph navigation and tab
switching
- Extracts reusable `useSubgraphNavigation` composable with
callback-based API
- Adds comprehensive tests for subgraph functionality
- Ensures proper graph context restoration during tab switches



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd4ff16a-4071-4da6-903f-b2be8dd6e672



┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5572-feat-Add-Vue-node-subgraph-title-button-with-lifecycle-management-26f6d73d365081bfbd9cfd7d2775e1ef)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: DrJKL <DrJKL@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-09-19 14:19:06 -07:00
Christian Byrne
6349ceee6c [refactor] Improve renderer domain organization (#5552)
* [refactor] Improve renderer architecture organization

Building on PR #5388, this refines the renderer domain structure:

**Key improvements:**
- Group all transform utilities in `transform/` subdirectory for better cohesion
- Move canvas state to dedicated `renderer/core/canvas/` domain
- Consolidate coordinate system logic (TransformPane, useTransformState, sync utilities)

**File organization:**
- `renderer/core/canvas/canvasStore.ts` (was `stores/graphStore.ts`)
- `renderer/core/layout/transform/` contains all coordinate system utilities
- Transform sync utilities co-located with core transform logic

This creates clearer domain boundaries and groups related functionality
while building on the foundation established in PR #5388.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: Clean up linter-modified files

* Fix import paths and clean up unused imports after rebase

- Update all remaining @/stores/graphStore references to @/renderer/core/canvas/canvasStore
- Remove unused imports from selection toolbox components
- All tests pass, only reka-ui upstream issue remains in typecheck

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* [auto-fix] Apply ESLint and Prettier fixes

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com>
2025-09-14 21:28:08 -07:00
Christian Byrne
b4b732ad8f [refactor] Extract Vue node entry point logic into focused composables (#5390)
* refactor: Extract Vue node entry point logic into focused composables

- Extract logic from GraphCanvas.vue (735→200 lines) into 3 composables:
  - useVueNodeLifecycle: Node manager initialization and cleanup
  - useViewportCulling: Viewport culling with transform sync
  - useNodeEventHandlers: Node selection, collapse, title handlers

- Remove type assertions by using comfyApp.canvas instead of canvasStore.canvas
- Eliminate getter anti-pattern with proper Vue reactive refs
- Fix all TypeScript compatibility issues without workarounds
- Maintain proper separation of concerns and Vue-idiomatic patterns

* style: Remove extra comments from return statement

* [auto-fix] Apply ESLint and Prettier fixes

* style: Remove conversational comments

- Remove temporary comments that only made sense in refactoring context
- Clean up comment wording to be more permanent/professional
- Keep meaningful comments about code behavior and architecture

---------

Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com>
2025-09-06 04:26:23 -07:00