## Summary
- Extract all 75 `quickRegister()` mapping entries from
`modelToNodeStore.ts` into a new `modelNodeMappings.ts` constants file
- The store now iterates over the `MODEL_NODE_MAPPINGS` array instead of
having inline calls
- **Zero behavioral change** — same mappings, same order, same runtime
behavior
## Motivation
Adding new model-to-node mappings is currently a code change to the
store. By separating the data into its own file:
- New mappings are a **pure data change** (append a tuple to an array)
- The data file can have its own CODEOWNERS entry, so mapping PRs can be
merged without requiring frontend team review
- Easier to audit — all mappings visible in one place without
interleaved store logic
### Before
```ts
// 250+ lines of quickRegister() calls mixed into store logic
quickRegister('checkpoints', 'CheckpointLoaderSimple', 'ckpt_name')
quickRegister('checkpoints', 'ImageOnlyCheckpointLoader', 'ckpt_name')
// ... 73 more
```
### After
```ts
// modelNodeMappings.ts — pure data
export const MODEL_NODE_MAPPINGS = [
['checkpoints', 'CheckpointLoaderSimple', 'ckpt_name'],
['checkpoints', 'ImageOnlyCheckpointLoader', 'ckpt_name'],
// ...
]
// modelToNodeStore.ts — just iterates
for (const [modelType, nodeClass, key] of MODEL_NODE_MAPPINGS) {
quickRegister(modelType, nodeClass, key)
}
```
## Test plan
- [ ] "Use" button in model browser still works for all model types
- [ ] No regressions in model-to-node resolution (same mappings, same
order)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-10237-refactor-extract-model-to-node-mappings-into-separate-data-file-3276d73d365081988656e2ddae772bbc)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Brown <drjkl@comfy.org>
Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com>
## Summary
Remove team assignments from CODEOWNERS to reduce notification noise for
internal PRs. Add a workflow that requests team review only when
external contributors open PRs.
## Changes
- **What**: Strip `@Comfy-org/comfy_frontend_devs` and
`@Comfy-Org/comfy_maintainer` from all CODEOWNERS entries (keep
individual user assignments). Add `pr-request-team-review.yaml` workflow
that uses `pull_request_target` to request team review for
non-collaborator PRs.
- **Dependencies**: None
## Review Focus
- The workflow uses `pull_request_target` but does not check out or
execute any untrusted code — it only runs `gh pr edit --add-reviewer`.
- The `author_association` check excludes OWNER, MEMBER, and
COLLABORATOR — internal PRs will not trigger team review requests.
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-10104-chore-replace-team-CODEOWNERS-with-external-PR-review-workflow-3256d73d3650813b887ac16b5e97b4c4)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
Updated CODEOWNERS file to include @Comfy-org/comfy_frontend_devs as an
owner for multiple paths.
## Summary
<!-- One sentence describing what changed and why. -->
## Changes
- **What**: <!-- Core functionality added/modified -->
- **Breaking**: <!-- Any breaking changes (if none, remove this line)
-->
- **Dependencies**: <!-- New dependencies (if none, remove this line)
-->
## Review Focus
<!-- Critical design decisions or edge cases that need attention -->
<!-- If this PR fixes an issue, uncomment and update the line below -->
<!-- Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER -->
## Screenshots (if applicable)
<!-- Add screenshots or video recording to help explain your changes -->
## Summary
Removes the legacy mask editor. May also want to remove the "Beta" tags
on all the current mask editor components/mentions in the app now as
well.
## Context
Telemetry data shows zero users using the legacy mask editor. It has
been considerable time since we switched to the new one, and there
really is no reason to use the legacy version given how lacking it is.
In https://github.com/Comfy-Org/ComfyUI_frontend/pull/7332 (v1.35.2 -
Dec 11, 2025), we added a final warning that the legacy mask editor is
being removed.
On 1.36, this PR can be merged, as more than enough warning will have
been given.
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-7370-cleanup-remove-the-legacy-mask-editor-and-all-related-code-2c66d73d365081d58fbed0f3c84bcb0d)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
Finalmente o idioma em Portugues do Brasil verá a luz do dia (se tudo
correr bem).
What has been done:
- Added pt-BR to .i18nrc.cjs and settings
- Included loaders in src/i18n.ts and apps/desktop-ui/src/i18n.ts
- Now Portuguese (BR) is displayed in the language selector
- Created empty main.json, commands.json, settings.json and
nodeDefs.json files to be populated by CI
- Checklist: the language appears in the dropdown list, selection occurs
without errors, the fallback to English, in case technical terms have no
translation, is working correctly.
- I will maintain the pt-br translation and review for as long as
necessary.
---------
Co-authored-by: Comfy Contributor <dev@example.com>
## Summary
Extracts desktop UI into apps/desktop-ui package with minimal changes.
## Changes
- **What**:
- Separates desktop-specific code into standalone package with
independent Vite config, router, and i18n
- Drastically simplifies the main app router by removing all desktop
routes
- Adds a some code duplication, most due to the existing design
- Some duplication can be refactored to be *simpler* on either side - no
need to split things by `isElectron()`
- Rudimentary storybook support has been added
- **Breaking**: Stacked PR for publishing must be merged before this PR
makes it to stable core (but publishing _could_ be done manually)
- #5915
- **Dependencies**: Takes full advantage of pnpm catalog. No additional
dependencies added.
## Review Focus
- Should be no changes to normal frontend operation
- Scripts added to root package.json are acceptable
- The duplication in this PR is copied as is, wherever possible. Any
corrections or fix-ups beyond the scope of simply migrating the
functionality as-is, can be addressed in later PRs. That said, if any
changes are made, it instantly becomes more difficult to separate the
duplicated code out into a shared utility.
- Tracking issue to address concerns: #5925
### i18n
Fixing i18n is out of scope for this PR. It is a larger task that we
should consider carefully and implement properly. Attempting to isolate
the desktop i18n and duplicate the _current_ localisation scripts would
be wasted energy.
