This pull request refactors and simplifies the template workflow card components and related UI in the codebase. The main changes focus on removing unused or redundant components, improving visual and interaction consistency, and enhancing error handling for images. Below are the most important changes grouped by theme: **Template Workflow Card Refactor and Cleanup** * Removed the `TemplateWorkflowCard.vue` component and its associated test file `TemplateWorkflowCard.spec.ts`, as well as the `TemplateWorkflowCardSkeleton.vue` and `TemplateWorkflowList.vue` components, indicating a shift away from the previous card-based template workflow UI. [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-49569af0404058e8257f3cc0716b066517ce7397dd58744b02aa0d0c61f2a815L1-L139) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-9fa6fc1470371f0b520d4deda4129fb313b1bea69888a376556f4bd824f9d751L1-L263) [[3]](diffhunk://#diff-bc35b6f77d1cee6e86b05d0da80b7bd40013c7a6a97a89706d3bc52573e1c574L1-L30) [[4]](diffhunk://#diff-48171f792b22022526fca411d3c3a366d48b675dab77943a20846ae079cbaf3bL1-L68) * Removed the `TemplateSearchBar.vue` component, suggesting a redesign or replacement of the search/filter UI for templates. **UI and Interaction Improvements** * Improved the `CardBottom.vue` component by making its height configurable via a `fullHeight` prop, enhancing layout flexibility. * Updated the `CardContainer.vue` component to add hover effects (background, border, shadow, and padding) and support a new `none` aspect ratio for more flexible card layouts. **Image and Input Enhancements** * Enhanced the `LazyImage.vue` component to display a default placeholder image when an image fails to load, improving error handling and user experience. * Improved the `SearchBox.vue` component by making the input focusable when clicking anywhere on the wrapper, and added a template ref for better accessibility and usability. [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-08f3b0c51fbfe63171509b9944bf7558228f6c2596a1ef5338e88ab64585791bL2-R5) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-08f3b0c51fbfe63171509b9944bf7558228f6c2596a1ef5338e88ab64585791bL16-R17) [[3]](diffhunk://#diff-08f3b0c51fbfe63171509b9944bf7558228f6c2596a1ef5338e88ab64585791bR33-R39) **Minor UI Tweaks** * Adjusted label styling in `SingleSelect.vue` to remove unnecessary overflow handling, simplifying the visual layout. --------- Co-authored-by: Benjamin Lu <benceruleanlu@proton.me> Co-authored-by: Alexander Brown <drjkl@comfy.org> Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com> Co-authored-by: Christian Byrne <cbyrne@comfy.org> Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: snomiao <snomiao@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: filtered <176114999+webfiltered@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Comfy Org PR Bot <snomiao+comfy-pr@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jin Yi <jin12cc@gmail.com>
Services
This directory contains the service layer for the ComfyUI frontend application. Services encapsulate application logic and functionality into organized, reusable modules.
Table of Contents
Overview
Services in ComfyUI provide organized modules that implement the application's functionality and logic. They handle operations such as API communication, workflow management, user settings, and other essential features.
The term "business logic" in this context refers to the code that implements the core functionality and behavior of the application - the rules, processes, and operations that make ComfyUI work as expected, separate from the UI display code.
Services help organize related functionality into cohesive units, making the codebase more maintainable and testable. By centralizing related operations in services, the application achieves better separation of concerns, with UI components focusing on presentation and services handling functional operations.
Service Architecture
The service layer in ComfyUI follows these architectural principles:
- Domain-driven: Each service focuses on a specific domain of the application
- Stateless when possible: Services generally avoid maintaining internal state
- Reusable: Services can be used across multiple components
- Testable: Services are designed for easy unit testing
- Isolated: Services have clear boundaries and dependencies
While services can interact with both UI components and stores (centralized state), they primarily focus on implementing functionality rather than managing state. The following diagram illustrates how services fit into the application architecture:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ UI Components │
└────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Composables │
└────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Services │
│ │
│ (Application Functionality) │
└────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┘
│
┌───────────┴───────────┐
▼ ▼
┌───────────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────┐
│ Stores │ │ External APIs │
│ (Centralized State) │ │ │
└───────────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────┘
Core Services
The following table lists ALL services in the system as of 2025-09-01:
Main Services
| Service | Description | Category |
|---|---|---|
| audioService.ts | Manages audio recording and WAV encoding functionality | Media |
| autoQueueService.ts | Manages automatic queue execution | Execution |
| colorPaletteService.ts | Handles color palette management and customization | UI |
| comfyManagerService.ts | Manages ComfyUI application packages and updates | Manager |
| comfyRegistryService.ts | Handles registration and discovery of ComfyUI extensions | Registry |
| customerEventsService.ts | Handles customer event tracking and audit logs | Analytics |
| dialogService.ts | Provides dialog and modal management | UI |
| extensionService.ts | Manages extension registration and lifecycle | Extensions |
| keybindingService.ts | Handles keyboard shortcuts and keybindings | Input |
| litegraphService.ts | Provides utilities for working with the LiteGraph library | Graph |
| load3dService.ts | Manages 3D model loading and visualization | 3D |
| mediaCacheService.ts | Manages media file caching with blob storage and cleanup | Media |
| newUserService.ts | Handles new user initialization and onboarding | System |
| nodeHelpService.ts | Provides node documentation and help | Nodes |
| nodeOrganizationService.ts | Handles node organization and categorization | Nodes |
| nodeSearchService.ts | Implements node search functionality | Search |
| releaseService.ts | Manages application release information and updates | System |
| subgraphService.ts | Handles subgraph operations and navigation | Graph |
| workflowService.ts | Handles workflow operations (save, load, execute) | Workflows |
Gateway Services
Located in services/gateway/:
| Service | Description |
|---|---|
| registrySearchGateway.ts | Gateway for registry search operations |
Provider Services
Located in services/providers/:
| Service | Description |
|---|---|
| algoliaSearchProvider.ts | Implements search functionality using Algolia |
| registrySearchProvider.ts | Provides registry search capabilities |
Service Development Guidelines
In ComfyUI, services can be implemented using two approaches:
1. Class-based Services
For complex services with state management and multiple methods, class-based services are used:
export class NodeSearchService {
// Service state
public readonly nodeFuseSearch: FuseSearch<ComfyNodeDefImpl>
public readonly inputTypeFilter: FuseFilter<ComfyNodeDefImpl, string>
public readonly outputTypeFilter: FuseFilter<ComfyNodeDefImpl, string>
public readonly nodeCategoryFilter: FuseFilter<ComfyNodeDefImpl, string>
public readonly nodeSourceFilter: FuseFilter<ComfyNodeDefImpl, string>
constructor(data: ComfyNodeDefImpl[]) {
// Initialize search index
this.nodeFuseSearch = new FuseSearch(data, {
fuseOptions: {
keys: ['name', 'display_name'],
includeScore: true,
threshold: 0.3,
shouldSort: false,
useExtendedSearch: true
},
createIndex: true,
advancedScoring: true
})
// Setup individual filters
const fuseOptions = { includeScore: true, threshold: 0.3, shouldSort: true }
this.inputTypeFilter = new FuseFilter<ComfyNodeDefImpl, string>(data, {
id: 'input',
name: 'Input Type',
invokeSequence: 'i',
getItemOptions: (node) => Object.values(node.inputs).map((input) => input.type),
fuseOptions
})
// Additional filters initialized similarly...
}
public searchNode(
query: string,
filters: FuseFilterWithValue<ComfyNodeDefImpl, string>[] = []
): ComfyNodeDefImpl[] {
const matchedNodes = this.nodeFuseSearch.search(query)
return matchedNodes.filter((node) => {
return filters.every((filterAndValue) => {
const { filterDef, value } = filterAndValue
return filterDef.matches(node, value, { wildcard: '*' })
})
})
}
get nodeFilters(): FuseFilter<ComfyNodeDefImpl, string>[] {
return [
this.inputTypeFilter,
this.outputTypeFilter,
this.nodeCategoryFilter,
this.nodeSourceFilter
]
}
}
2. Composable-style Services
For services that need to integrate with Vue's reactivity system or handle API interactions, we use composable-style services:
export function useNodeSearchService(initialData: ComfyNodeDefImpl[]) {
// State (reactive if needed)
const data = ref(initialData)
// Search functionality
function searchNodes(query: string) {
// Implementation
return results
}
// Additional methods
function refreshData(newData: ComfyNodeDefImpl[]) {
data.value = newData
}
// Return public API
return {
searchNodes,
refreshData
}
}
Service Pattern Comparison
| Aspect | Class-Based Services | Composable-Style Services | Bootstrap Services | Shared State Services |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | 4 services | 18+ services | 1 service | 1 service |
| Export Pattern | export class ServiceName |
export function useServiceName() |
export function setupX() |
export function serviceFactory() |
| Instantiation | new ServiceName(data) |
useServiceName() |
Direct function call | Direct function call |
| Best For | Complex data structures, search algorithms, expensive initialization | Vue integration, API calls, reactive state | One-time app initialization | Singleton-like shared state |
| State Management | Encapsulated private/public properties | External stores + reactive refs | Event listeners, side effects | Module-level state |
| Vue Integration | Manual integration needed | Native reactivity support | N/A | Varies |
| Examples | NodeSearchService, Load3dService |
workflowService, dialogService |
autoQueueService |
newUserService |
Decision Criteria
When choosing between these approaches, consider:
- Data Structure Complexity: Classes work well for services managing multiple related data structures (search indices, filters, complex state)
- Initialization Cost: Classes are ideal when expensive setup should happen once and be controlled by instantiation
- Vue Integration: Composables integrate seamlessly with Vue's reactivity system and stores
- API Interactions: Composables handle async operations and API calls more naturally
- State Management: Classes provide strong encapsulation; composables work better with external state management
- Application Bootstrap: Bootstrap services handle one-time app initialization, event listener setup, and side effects
- Singleton Behavior: Shared state services provide module-level state that persists across multiple function calls
Current Usage Patterns:
- Class-based services (4): Complex data processing, search algorithms, expensive initialization
- Composable-style services (18+): UI interactions, API calls, store integration, reactive state management
- Bootstrap services (1): One-time application initialization and event handler setup
- Shared state services (1): Singleton-like behavior with module-level state management
Service Template
Here's a template for creating a new composable-style service:
/**
* Service for managing [domain/functionality]
*/
export function useExampleService() {
// Private state/functionality
const cache = new Map()
/**
* Description of what this method does
* @param param1 Description of parameter
* @returns Description of return value
*/
async function performOperation(param1: string) {
try {
// Implementation
return result
} catch (error) {
// Error handling
console.error(`Operation failed: ${error.message}`)
throw error
}
}
// Return public API
return {
performOperation
}
}
Common Design Patterns
Services in ComfyUI frequently use the following design patterns:
Caching and Request Deduplication
export function useCachedService() {
const cache = new Map()
const pendingRequests = new Map()
async function fetchData(key: string) {
// Check cache first
if (cache.has(key)) return cache.get(key)
// Check if request is already in progress
if (pendingRequests.has(key)) {
return pendingRequests.get(key)
}
// Perform new request
const requestPromise = fetch(`/api/${key}`)
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
cache.set(key, data)
pendingRequests.delete(key)
return data
})
pendingRequests.set(key, requestPromise)
return requestPromise
}
return { fetchData }
}
Factory Pattern
export function useNodeFactory() {
function createNode(type: string, config: Record<string, any>) {
// Create node based on type and configuration
switch (type) {
case 'basic':
return { /* basic node implementation */ }
case 'complex':
return { /* complex node implementation */ }
default:
throw new Error(`Unknown node type: ${type}`)
}
}
return { createNode }
}
Facade Pattern
export function useWorkflowService(
apiService,
graphService,
storageService
) {
// Provides a simple interface to complex subsystems
async function saveWorkflow(name: string) {
const graphData = graphService.serializeGraph()
const storagePath = await storageService.getPath(name)
return apiService.saveData(storagePath, graphData)
}
return { saveWorkflow }
}
Testing Services
Services in ComfyUI can be tested effectively using different approaches depending on their implementation pattern.
Testing Class-Based Services
Setup Requirements:
// Manual instantiation required
const mockData = [/* test data */]
const service = new NodeSearchService(mockData)
Characteristics:
- Requires constructor argument preparation
- State is encapsulated within the class instance
- Direct method calls on the instance
- Good isolation - each test gets a fresh instance
Example:
describe('NodeSearchService', () => {
let service: NodeSearchService
beforeEach(() => {
const mockNodes = [/* mock node definitions */]
service = new NodeSearchService(mockNodes)
})
test('should search nodes by query', () => {
const results = service.searchNode('test query')
expect(results).toHaveLength(2)
})
test('should apply filters correctly', () => {
const filters = [{ filterDef: service.inputTypeFilter, value: 'IMAGE' }]
const results = service.searchNode('*', filters)
expect(results.every(node => /* has IMAGE input */)).toBe(true)
})
})
Testing Composable-Style Services
Setup Requirements:
// Direct function call, no instantiation
const { saveWorkflow, loadWorkflow } = useWorkflowService()
Characteristics:
- No instantiation needed
- Integrates naturally with Vue Test Utils
- Easy mocking of reactive dependencies
- External store dependencies need mocking
Example:
describe('useWorkflowService', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// Mock external dependencies
vi.mock('@/stores/settingStore', () => ({
useSettingStore: () => ({
get: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(true),
set: vi.fn()
})
}))
vi.mock('@/stores/toastStore', () => ({
useToastStore: () => ({
add: vi.fn()
})
}))
})
test('should save workflow with prompt', async () => {
const { saveWorkflow } = useWorkflowService()
await saveWorkflow('test-workflow')
// Verify interactions with mocked dependencies
expect(mockSettingStore.get).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Comfy.PromptFilename')
})
})
Testing Bootstrap Services
Focus on Setup Behavior:
describe('autoQueueService', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// Mock global dependencies
vi.mock('@/scripts/api', () => ({
api: {
addEventListener: vi.fn()
}
}))
vi.mock('@/scripts/app', () => ({
app: {
queuePrompt: vi.fn()
}
}))
})
test('should setup event listeners', () => {
setupAutoQueueHandler()
expect(mockApi.addEventListener).toHaveBeenCalledWith('graphChanged', expect.any(Function))
})
test('should handle graph changes when auto-queue enabled', () => {
setupAutoQueueHandler()
// Simulate graph change event
const graphChangeHandler = mockApi.addEventListener.mock.calls[0][1]
graphChangeHandler()
expect(mockApp.queuePrompt).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})
Testing Shared State Services
Focus on Shared State Behavior:
describe('newUserService', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// Reset module state between tests
vi.resetModules()
})
test('should return consistent API across calls', () => {
const service1 = newUserService()
const service2 = newUserService()
// Same functions returned (shared behavior)
expect(service1.isNewUser).toBeDefined()
expect(service2.isNewUser).toBeDefined()
})
test('should share state between service instances', async () => {
const service1 = newUserService()
const service2 = newUserService()
// Initialize through one instance
const mockSettingStore = { set: vi.fn() }
await service1.initializeIfNewUser(mockSettingStore)
// State should be shared
expect(service2.isNewUser()).toBe(true) // or false, depending on mock
})
})
Common Testing Patterns
Mocking External Dependencies:
// Mock stores
vi.mock('@/stores/settingStore', () => ({
useSettingStore: () => ({
get: vi.fn(),
set: vi.fn()
})
}))
// Mock API calls
vi.mock('@/scripts/api', () => ({
api: {
get: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: 'mock' }),
post: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ success: true })
}
}))
// Mock Vue composables
vi.mock('vue', () => ({
ref: vi.fn((val) => ({ value: val })),
reactive: vi.fn((obj) => obj)
}))
Async Testing:
test('should handle async operations', async () => {
const service = useMyService()
const result = await service.performAsyncOperation()
expect(result).toBeTruthy()
})
test('should handle concurrent requests', async () => {
const service = useMyService()
const promises = [
service.loadData('key1'),
service.loadData('key2')
]
const results = await Promise.all(promises)
expect(results).toHaveLength(2)
})
Error Handling:
test('should handle service errors gracefully', async () => {
const service = useMyService()
// Mock API to throw error
mockApi.get.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Network error'))
await expect(service.fetchData()).rejects.toThrow('Network error')
})
test('should provide meaningful error messages', async () => {
const service = useMyService()
const consoleSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation()
await service.handleError('test error')
expect(consoleSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('test error'))
})
Testing Best Practices
- Isolate Dependencies: Always mock external dependencies (stores, APIs, DOM)
- Reset State: Use
beforeEachto ensure clean test state - Test Error Paths: Don't just test happy paths - test error scenarios
- Mock Timers: Use
vi.useFakeTimers()for time-dependent services - Test Async Properly: Use
async/awaitand proper promise handling
For more detailed information about the service layer pattern and its applications, refer to: