Files
ComfyUI_frontend/browser_tests/tests/graph.spec.ts
2026-07-06 12:36:01 -07:00

128 lines
4.9 KiB
TypeScript

import { expect } from '@playwright/test'
import { toLinkId } from '@/types/linkId'
import { toNodeId } from '@/types/nodeId'
import { comfyPageFixture as test } from '@e2e/fixtures/ComfyPage'
test.beforeEach(async ({ comfyPage }) => {
await comfyPage.settings.setSetting('Comfy.UseNewMenu', 'Disabled')
})
test.describe('Graph', { tag: ['@smoke', '@canvas'] }, () => {
// Should be able to fix link input slot index after swap the input order
// Ref: https://github.com/Comfy-Org/ComfyUI_frontend/issues/3348
test('Fix link input slots', async ({ comfyPage }) => {
await comfyPage.workflow.loadWorkflow('inputs/input_order_swap')
await expect
.poll(() =>
comfyPage.page.evaluate(
(linkId) => window.app!.graph!.links.get(linkId)?.target_slot,
toLinkId(1)
)
)
.toBe(1)
})
test('Validate workflow links', async ({ comfyPage }) => {
await comfyPage.settings.setSetting('Comfy.Validation.Workflows', true)
await comfyPage.workflow.loadWorkflow('links/bad_link')
await expect(comfyPage.toast.visibleToasts).toHaveCount(2)
})
// Regression: duplicate links with shifted target_slot (widget-to-input
// conversion) caused the wrong link to survive during deduplication.
// Switch(CFG) node 120 connects to both KSamplerAdvanced 85 and 86 (2 links).
// Links 257 and 276 shared the same tuple (origin=120 → target=85 slot=5).
// Node 85's input.link was 276 (valid), but the bug kept 257 (stale) and
// removed 276, breaking the cfg connection on KSamplerAdvanced 85.
// Ref: https://github.com/Comfy-Org/ComfyUI_frontend/issues/10291
test('Deduplicates links without breaking connections on slot-drift workflow', async ({
comfyPage
}) => {
await comfyPage.workflow.loadWorkflow('links/duplicate_links_slot_drift')
function evaluateGraph() {
const nodeIds = {
switchCfg: toNodeId(120),
ksampler85: toNodeId(85),
ksampler86: toNodeId(86)
}
return comfyPage.page.evaluate((nodeIds) => {
const graph = window.app!.graph!
const subgraph = graph.subgraphs.values().next().value
if (!subgraph) return { error: 'No subgraph found' }
// Node 120 = Switch (CFG), connects to both KSamplerAdvanced 85 and 86
const switchCfg = subgraph.getNodeById(nodeIds.switchCfg)
const ksampler85 = subgraph.getNodeById(nodeIds.ksampler85)
const ksampler86 = subgraph.getNodeById(nodeIds.ksampler86)
if (!switchCfg || !ksampler85 || !ksampler86)
return { error: 'Required nodes not found' }
// Find cfg inputs by name (slot indices shift due to widget-to-input)
const cfgInput85 = ksampler85.inputs.find(
(i: { name: string }) => i.name === 'cfg'
)
const cfgInput86 = ksampler86.inputs.find(
(i: { name: string }) => i.name === 'cfg'
)
const cfg85Linked = cfgInput85?.link != null
const cfg86Linked = cfgInput86?.link != null
// Verify the surviving links exist in the subgraph link map
const cfg85LinkValid =
cfg85Linked && subgraph.links.has(cfgInput85!.link!)
const cfg86LinkValid =
cfg86Linked && subgraph.links.has(cfgInput86!.link!)
// Switch(CFG) output should have exactly 2 links (one to each KSampler)
const switchOutputLinkCount = switchCfg.outputs[0]?.links?.length ?? 0
// Count links from Switch(CFG) to node 85 cfg (should be 1, not 2)
let cfgLinkToNode85Count = 0
for (const link of subgraph.links.values()) {
if (
String(link.origin_id) === '120' &&
String(link.target_id) === '85'
)
cfgLinkToNode85Count++
}
return {
cfg85Linked,
cfg86Linked,
cfg85LinkValid,
cfg86LinkValid,
cfg85LinkId: cfgInput85?.link ?? null,
cfg86LinkId: cfgInput86?.link ?? null,
switchOutputLinkIds: [...(switchCfg.outputs[0]?.links ?? [])],
switchOutputLinkCount,
cfgLinkToNode85Count
}
}, nodeIds)
}
// Poll graph state once, then assert all properties
await expect(async () => {
const r = await evaluateGraph()
// Both KSamplerAdvanced nodes must have their cfg input connected
expect(r.cfg85Linked).toBe(true)
expect(r.cfg86Linked).toBe(true)
// Links must exist in the subgraph link map
expect(r.cfg85LinkValid).toBe(true)
expect(r.cfg86LinkValid).toBe(true)
// Switch(CFG) output has exactly 2 links (one per KSamplerAdvanced)
expect(r.switchOutputLinkCount).toBe(2)
// Only 1 link from Switch(CFG) to node 85 (duplicate removed)
expect(r.cfgLinkToNode85Count).toBe(1)
// Output link IDs must match the input link IDs (source/target integrity)
expect(r.switchOutputLinkIds).toEqual(
expect.arrayContaining([r.cfg85LinkId, r.cfg86LinkId])
)
}).toPass({ timeout: 5000 })
})
})