mirror of
https://github.com/DominikDoom/a1111-sd-webui-tagcomplete.git
synced 2026-11-05 00:17:25 +00:00
[GH-ISSUE #289] [Feature Request] Dynamic Tag List Switching #200
Labels
No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
low priority
low priority
pull-request
question
waiting for feedback
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
DominikDoom/a1111-sd-webui-tagcomplete#200
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @AviceProjects on GitHub (May 31, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/DominikDoom/a1111-sd-webui-tagcomplete/issues/289
Originally assigned to: @DominikDoom on GitHub.
Allow dynamic tag list switching based on the current model. (For example, if I am using an anime model, but switch to a furry model, I'll want my tags to switch from Danbooru tags to e621 tags)
@DominikDoom commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2024):
Model switching detection based on name or hash is already a thing due to the black/whitelist feature, so it's not hard to expand per se.
The issue is more that I am unsure of how to let the user enter the mapping in a good way using the settings UI, which is also why I haven't added it so far.
Gradio support/UI for multi-line text fields is pretty bad, except with code blocks, which I use for the keybinds and color mappings.
What I don't like about these is that the JSON format I need there requires the user to enter syntactically correct key-value pairs, which is ok for predefined stuff like keybinds but could be an issue if the user has to enter it from scratch. Maybe a simple csv style input would be better for this case here, although it would also be a bit harder to parse from the settings input.
Any opinions on what you would prefer?