[CK_BUILDER] Integrate CKB validation with CK verification (#3649)

* ck-builder: tensor copy function

This function copies one tensor to another, so that the memory
layout can be changed between them.

* ck-builder: fix ck::bhalf literals

These types don't work properly.

* ck-builder: abstract compare_elements in gpu_verification.hpp and make builder use it

This reduces the amount of duplicated code a bit.

* ck-builder: add flat tensor iterator

This "iterator" type pretends to be a pointer, useful for passing
tensors to functions expecting pointer-like types.

* ck-builder: integrate validation with ck gpu verification

By templating the gpu_verify function over iterators, we can use
the new FlatTensorIterator to adapt the function to multi-
dimensional tensors without changing either implementation
too much.

* ck-builder: add check_by_accumulations

This changes the gpu_verification.hpp code to also accept "iterator"
types for the relevant gpu_verify and gpu_reduce_max functions.

* ck: fix test_gpu_verification GenerateRandomData for bhalf

is_integer_it<bhalf_t> yields true, but it is not actually
an integer.

* ck: make gpu_verification kernels be proper persistent kernels

Previously these were using a hardcoded value for the grid size. This
commit changes that so that the grid size is automatically derived
from the kernel's occupancy and the number of multiprocessors on
the GPU.

* ck: clean up gpu_verification.hpp using block_reduce

This implements a small generic block reduce function, and rewrites
the rest of gpu_verification.hpp using that function to clean it up
a bit.

* ck-builder: doc typos

* ck-builder: update testing readme with validation interface.

* ck-builder: rebase fixes + review comments

* ck-builder: fix device integer generation with float types

Passing bfloat here causes a nans due to type_convert performing
a bitcast.

* ck: another bhalf_t bug

CK expects that int-generation with ck::bhalf_t yields bhalf integers,
not unsigned integers. This makes the logic of FillUniformRandInteger
compatible with GeneratorTensor_2<InDataType>, however idiotic that
may be.
This commit is contained in:
Robin Voetter
2026-01-28 17:41:02 +01:00
committed by GitHub
parent d6cccf6093
commit 42048bdb7d
11 changed files with 636 additions and 291 deletions

View File

@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ TYPED_TEST(ValidationReportTests, SingleCorrect)
ckt::fill_tensor(desc, b.get(), generator);
ckt::ValidationReport report;
report.check("correct", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check("correct - explicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check_by_accumulations("correct - implicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get(), 0);
EXPECT_THAT(report.get_errors().size(), Eq(0));
}
@@ -97,17 +98,22 @@ TYPED_TEST(ValidationReportTests, SingleIncorrect)
});
ckt::ValidationReport report;
report.check("incorrect", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check("incorrect - explicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check_by_accumulations("incorrect - implicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get(), 0);
const auto errors = report.get_errors();
const auto flat_size = desc.get_element_size();
const auto expected_errors = flat_size >= 999999 ? 3 : flat_size >= 12345 ? 2 : 1;
ASSERT_THAT(errors.size(), Eq(1));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].tensor_name, StrEq("incorrect"));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].wrong_elements, Eq(expected_errors));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].total_elements, Eq(desc.get_element_size()));
ASSERT_THAT(errors.size(), Eq(2));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].tensor_name, StrEq("incorrect - explicit tolerance"));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[1].tensor_name, StrEq("incorrect - implicit tolerance"));
for(int i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
{
EXPECT_THAT(errors[i].wrong_elements, Eq(expected_errors));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[i].total_elements, Eq(desc.get_element_size()));
}
}
TYPED_TEST(ValidationReportTests, ZeroIsIncorrect)
@@ -121,14 +127,20 @@ TYPED_TEST(ValidationReportTests, ZeroIsIncorrect)
ckt::clear_tensor_buffer(desc, b.get());
ckt::ValidationReport report;
report.check("zero_is_incorrect", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check("zero_is_incorrect - explicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check_by_accumulations(
"zero_is_incorrect - implicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get(), 0);
const auto errors = report.get_errors();
ASSERT_THAT(errors.size(), Eq(1));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].tensor_name, StrEq("zero_is_incorrect"));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].wrong_elements, Eq(0));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].total_elements, Eq(desc.get_element_size()));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].zero_elements, Eq(desc.get_element_size()));
ASSERT_THAT(errors.size(), Eq(2));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].tensor_name, StrEq("zero_is_incorrect - explicit tolerance"));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[1].tensor_name, StrEq("zero_is_incorrect - implicit tolerance"));
for(int i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
{
EXPECT_THAT(errors[i].wrong_elements, Eq(0));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[i].total_elements, Eq(desc.get_element_size()));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[i].both_all_zero, Eq(true));
}
}
TEST(ValidationReportTests, MultipleSomeIncorrect)
@@ -143,11 +155,12 @@ TEST(ValidationReportTests, MultipleSomeIncorrect)
auto b = ckt::alloc_tensor_buffer(desc);
ckt::fill_tensor_buffer(
desc, a.get(), [](size_t i) { return ck::type_convert<ck::bhalf_t>(i % 100); });
desc, a.get(), [](size_t i) { return ck::type_convert<ck::bhalf_t>(float(i % 100)); });
ckt::fill_tensor_buffer(
desc, b.get(), [](size_t i) { return ck::type_convert<ck::bhalf_t>(i % 101); });
desc, b.get(), [](size_t i) { return ck::type_convert<ck::bhalf_t>(float(i % 101)); });
report.check("incorrect 1", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check("incorrect 1 - explicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check("incorrect 1 - implicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get(), 0);
}
{
@@ -169,7 +182,8 @@ TEST(ValidationReportTests, MultipleSomeIncorrect)
}
});
report.check("correct", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check("correct - explicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check("correct - implicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get(), 0);
}
{
@@ -182,16 +196,21 @@ TEST(ValidationReportTests, MultipleSomeIncorrect)
ckt::fill_tensor_buffer(desc, a.get(), []([[maybe_unused]] size_t i) { return 1; });
ckt::fill_tensor_buffer(desc, b.get(), []([[maybe_unused]] size_t i) { return 555; });
report.check("incorrect 2", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check("incorrect 2 - explicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get());
report.check("incorrect 2 - implicit tolerance", desc, b.get(), a.get(), 0);
}
const auto errors = report.get_errors();
ASSERT_THAT(errors.size(), Eq(2));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].tensor_name, StrEq("incorrect 1"));
ASSERT_THAT(errors.size(), Eq(4));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].tensor_name, StrEq("incorrect 1 - explicit tolerance"));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[0].wrong_elements, Eq(46840334));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[1].tensor_name, StrEq("incorrect 2"));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[1].wrong_elements, Eq(482800));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[1].tensor_name, StrEq("incorrect 1 - implicit tolerance"));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[1].wrong_elements, Eq(46840334));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[2].tensor_name, StrEq("incorrect 2 - explicit tolerance"));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[2].wrong_elements, Eq(482800));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[3].tensor_name, StrEq("incorrect 2 - implicit tolerance"));
EXPECT_THAT(errors[3].wrong_elements, Eq(482800));
}
// MatchesReference operates on the types defined in testing.hpp, so just
@@ -234,7 +253,7 @@ ValidationReport validate<DUMMY_SIGNATURE>(const Args<DUMMY_SIGNATURE>& args,
{
ValidationReport report;
report.check("a", args.make_a_descriptor(), actual.a, expected.a);
report.check("b", args.make_b_descriptor(), actual.b, expected.b);
report.check_by_accumulations("b", args.make_b_descriptor(), actual.b, expected.b, 0);
return report;
}
@@ -299,5 +318,5 @@ TEST(MatchesReference, Incorrect)
EXPECT_THAT(listener.str(),
StringEqWithDiff( //
"1 tensors failed to validate\n"
" - a: 625/625 incorrect elements (~100%)"));
" - a: 625/625 incorrect elements (~100%), max error 1"));
}