[GH-ISSUE #5] Allow for local usage of the files. Clone only once and not rely on the github link for the index file. #1

Closed
opened 2026-10-15 17:59:14 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @wereretot on GitHub (Aug 28, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/SillyTavern/SillyTavern-Content/issues/5

It would be nice to not have to rely on the github link.

Originally created by @wereretot on GitHub (Aug 28, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/SillyTavern/SillyTavern-Content/issues/5 It would be nice to not have to rely on the github link.
Author
Owner

@Cohee1207 commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2023):

@Tony-sama any thoughts on potential improvements to the downloader here?

While we're brainstorming, I'd like to note that the use of index.json file is optional, and you can simply download the repo as a zip file and unpack it into your ST /public folder to use them the same way as you'd have them downloaded via the index with the music extension. Or do not use any of the provided assets any load your own music files.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1696433443 --> @Cohee1207 commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2023): @Tony-sama any thoughts on potential improvements to the downloader here? While we're brainstorming, I'd like to note that the use of index.json file is optional, and you can simply download the repo as a zip file and unpack it into your ST /public folder to use them the same way as you'd have them downloaded via the index with the music extension. Or do not use any of the provided assets any load your own music files.
Author
Owner

@Tony-sama commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2023):

Technically people can clone the repo inside "public" folder since the assets folder hierarchy is the same on ST and ST-content (at the time of writing at least). But since people can put file in the assets folder manually I don't see the problem with the github link ?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1696586114 --> @Tony-sama commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2023): Technically people can clone the repo inside "public" folder since the assets folder hierarchy is the same on ST and ST-content (at the time of writing at least). But since people can put file in the assets folder manually I don't see the problem with the github link ?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
SillyTavern/SillyTavern-Content#1
No description provided.