From 98ec95877a95242e159b2bf0c879115a59e4c6e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Field G. Van Zee" Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:28:32 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Corrected comment for _obj_is_[row|col]_stored(). Details: - Fixed a mistake in the comments introduced in the previous commit for bli_obj_is_row_stored() and bli_obj_is_col_stored(). --- frame/include/bli_obj_macro_defs.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/frame/include/bli_obj_macro_defs.h b/frame/include/bli_obj_macro_defs.h index c6d65f84c..d7c098557 100644 --- a/frame/include/bli_obj_macro_defs.h +++ b/frame/include/bli_obj_macro_defs.h @@ -583,8 +583,8 @@ bli_obj_width_stored( obj ) // // NOTE: The following two macros differ from their non-obj counterparts -// in that they do not identify m x 1 and 1 x n objects as column-stored -// and row-stored, respectively, which is needed when considering packed +// in that they do not identify m x 1 and 1 x n objects as row-stored and +// column-stored, respectively, which is needed when considering packed // objects. But this is okay, since none of the invocations of these // "obj" macros are used on packed matrices. //