[GH-ISSUE #50] [Feature request] WireGuard over ShadowSocks #21

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-10-13 20:11:05 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 1 comment

bsakaguchi commented

2026-10-13 20:11:05 +00:00

Owner

Originally created by @kobin23 on GitHub (Jan 4, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amnezia-vpn/amnezia-client/issues/50

In some countries, in particular in Uzbekistan Wireguard is blocked. It would be nice if it were possible to use it with Shadowsocks

Originally created by @kobin23 on GitHub (Jan 4, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/amnezia-vpn/amnezia-client/issues/50 In some countries, in particular in Uzbekistan Wireguard is blocked. It would be nice if it were possible to use it with Shadowsocks

bsakaguchi closed this issue

2026-10-13 20:11:05 +00:00

bsakaguchi commented

2026-10-13 20:11:06 +00:00

Author

Owner

@pokamest commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2022):

Wireguard working using UDP protocol, but ShadowSocks is TCP transport, so it's impossible to wrap WireGuard by ShadowSocks.
But we going to test scheme WireGuard over Cloak.
Meanwhile you can use Cloak container in Amnezia - it working fine and able to pass DPI

@pokamest commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2022): Wireguard working using UDP protocol, but ShadowSocks is TCP transport, so it's impossible to wrap WireGuard by ShadowSocks. But we going to test scheme WireGuard over Cloak. Meanwhile you can use Cloak container in Amnezia - it working fine and able to pass DPI

bsakaguchi referenced this issue

2026-10-13 20:44:57 +00:00

[PR #21] [MERGED] Release 1.8.1 #1534