[GH-ISSUE #27] usage of ccache should be optional #19

Closed
opened 2026-10-26 09:43:31 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @z47z on GitHub (Mar 1, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/3FS/issues/27

Maybe compiling leverage ccache of personal interest is better. Sometimes it cached some broken target files, leading to confusing error report.
Anyway, just a recommendation.

Originally created by @z47z on GitHub (Mar 1, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/3FS/issues/27 Maybe compiling leverage ccache of personal interest is better. Sometimes it cached some broken target files, leading to confusing error report. Anyway, just a recommendation.
Author
Owner

@SF-Zhou commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2025):

Yes, ccache is not necessary.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2692189645 --> @SF-Zhou commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2025): Yes, ccache is not necessary.
Author
Owner

@SF-Zhou commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2025):

Fix in #28

<!-- gh-comment-id:2692191222 --> @SF-Zhou commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2025): Fix in #28
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
deepseek-ai/3FS#19
No description provided.