[GH-ISSUE #73] Can StorageClient support Nic Address Type IPoIB? #40

Closed
opened 2026-10-26 09:43:57 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @qsfang on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/3FS/issues/73

In our test environment, InfiniBand Nics are configured as IPoIB Mode, got error when using admin_cli to generate storage chain table:

Image

And i check the storageClientImp, find that it only supports RDMA address type

Image

Is it possible that storageClient can support IPoIB Mode ?

Originally created by @qsfang on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/3FS/issues/73 In our test environment, InfiniBand Nics are configured as IPoIB Mode, got error when using admin_cli to generate storage chain table: ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c614020a-402c-4f0c-8193-b2d7591febea) And i check the storageClientImp, find that it only supports RDMA address type ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1617f3ce-0693-454b-912f-286c4a807f44) Is it possible that storageClient can support IPoIB Mode ?
Author
Owner

@SF-Zhou commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025):

The read/write requests from the storage ultimately rely on RDMA Read/Write operations. Therefore, we have restricted the types of requests issued by the storage to RDMA only and do not support IPoIB.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2696104746 --> @SF-Zhou commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2025): The read/write requests from the storage ultimately rely on RDMA Read/Write operations. Therefore, we have restricted the types of requests issued by the storage to RDMA only and do not support IPoIB.
Author
Owner

@tyler-rt commented on GitHub (Sep 10, 2025):

fixed by https://github.com/deepseek-ai/3FS/pull/338

<!-- gh-comment-id:3273296947 --> @tyler-rt commented on GitHub (Sep 10, 2025): fixed by https://github.com/deepseek-ai/3FS/pull/338
Author
Owner

@tyler-rt commented on GitHub (Sep 10, 2025):

fixed by https://github.com/deepseek-ai/3FS/pull/338

<!-- gh-comment-id:3273297015 --> @tyler-rt commented on GitHub (Sep 10, 2025): fixed by https://github.com/deepseek-ai/3FS/pull/338
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
deepseek-ai/3FS#40
No description provided.