[GH-ISSUE #25] NVlink latency #26

Closed
opened 2026-10-26 09:52:43 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @zhang662817 on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepEP/issues/25

In Intranode, pure rdma latency is better than nvlink? could you show latency comparison data between nvlink and rdma.

Originally created by @zhang662817 on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepEP/issues/25 In Intranode, pure rdma latency is better than nvlink? could you show latency comparison data between nvlink and rdma.
Author
Owner

@sphish commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025):

As mentioned in https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepEP/issues/22#issuecomment-2684270222, our low latency kernels are optimized for internode communication. We have not yet implemented pure NVLink low-latency kernels.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2684568288 --> @sphish commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025): As mentioned in https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepEP/issues/22#issuecomment-2684270222, our low latency kernels are optimized for internode communication. We have not yet implemented pure NVLink low-latency kernels.
Author
Owner

@zhang662817 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Thanks

<!-- gh-comment-id:2686573958 --> @zhang662817 commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Thanks
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
deepseek-ai/DeepEP#26
No description provided.