[GH-ISSUE #507] Hi, DeepSeek team!Can we create a separate branch for the SM80 architecture? #325

Closed
opened 2026-10-26 09:58:38 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @kzlxd on GitHub (Dec 2, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepEP/issues/507

We have already adapted the SM80 architecture in commit bc118b248a, requiring only minor code modifications. However, when adapting it to the latest commit, we discovered a substantial amount of code work required. May I ask whether it would be possible to create a new branch from the previous commit specifically to support SM80?

Originally created by @kzlxd on GitHub (Dec 2, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepEP/issues/507 We have already adapted the SM80 architecture in commit bc118b248a07316c6b1f61d8e5b2dde069dae7e6, requiring only minor code modifications. However, when adapting it to the latest commit, we discovered a substantial amount of code work required. May I ask whether it would be possible to create a new branch from the previous commit specifically to support SM80?
Author
Owner

@kzlxd commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2025):

@sphish

<!-- gh-comment-id:3601760334 --> @kzlxd commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2025): @sphish
Author
Owner

@kzlxd commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025):

can we use this commit 6b17f4fa6e

<!-- gh-comment-id:3605473512 --> @kzlxd commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025): can we use this commit 6b17f4fa6e2fb093d7dc73563f52e3b32d088a6b
Author
Owner

@kzlxd commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2025):

latest commit is already adapted

<!-- gh-comment-id:3615241947 --> @kzlxd commented on GitHub (Dec 5, 2025): latest commit is already adapted
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
deepseek-ai/DeepEP#325
No description provided.