[GH-ISSUE #172] [Bug] cu128 test_bf16 error #99

Closed
opened 2026-10-26 21:12:32 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @FlamingoPg on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepGEMM/issues/172

I build with B200 cu128, test_bf16 failed:

➜  DeepGEMM git:(main) python3 /sgl-workspace/DeepGEMM/tests/test_bf16.py                                           
Library path:
 > ['/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/deep_gemm']

Testing GEMM:
Warning: please use at least NVCC 12.9 for the best DeepGEMM performanceNVCC compilation failed: nvcc fatal   : Unsupported gpu architecture 'sm_100f'

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/sgl-workspace/DeepGEMM/tests/test_bf16.py", line 123, in <module>
    test_gemm()
  File "/sgl-workspace/DeepGEMM/tests/test_bf16.py", line 30, in test_gemm
    getattr(deep_gemm, func_name)(a, b, d, c=c)
RuntimeError: Assertion error (csrc/apis/../jit_kernels/impls/../../jit/compiler.hpp:176): false and "NVCC compilation failed"
Originally created by @FlamingoPg on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepGEMM/issues/172 I build with B200 cu128, test_bf16 failed: ```bash ➜ DeepGEMM git:(main) python3 /sgl-workspace/DeepGEMM/tests/test_bf16.py Library path: > ['/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/deep_gemm'] Testing GEMM: Warning: please use at least NVCC 12.9 for the best DeepGEMM performanceNVCC compilation failed: nvcc fatal : Unsupported gpu architecture 'sm_100f' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/sgl-workspace/DeepGEMM/tests/test_bf16.py", line 123, in <module> test_gemm() File "/sgl-workspace/DeepGEMM/tests/test_bf16.py", line 30, in test_gemm getattr(deep_gemm, func_name)(a, b, d, c=c) RuntimeError: Assertion error (csrc/apis/../jit_kernels/impls/../../jit/compiler.hpp:176): false and "NVCC compilation failed" ```
Author
Owner

@FlamingoPg commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025):

I guess this PR break https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepGEMM/pull/157

<!-- gh-comment-id:3225142223 --> @FlamingoPg commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025): I guess this PR break https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepGEMM/pull/157
Author
Owner

@FlamingoPg commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025):

test_fp8 failed too.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3225143404 --> @FlamingoPg commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025): test_fp8 failed too.
Author
Owner

@zhyncs commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025):

@LyricZhao May you help take a look? Thanks!

<!-- gh-comment-id:3225168682 --> @zhyncs commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025): @LyricZhao May you help take a look? Thanks!
Author
Owner

@FlamingoPg commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025):

I tried to fix it lol, https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepGEMM/pull/173

<!-- gh-comment-id:3225285565 --> @FlamingoPg commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025): I tried to fix it lol, https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepGEMM/pull/173
Author
Owner

@LyricZhao commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025):

Thanks! Closing it now.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3226398718 --> @LyricZhao commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2025): Thanks! Closing it now.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
deepseek-ai/DeepGEMM#99
No description provided.