mirror of
https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1.git
synced 2026-11-05 00:47:42 +00:00
[GH-ISSUE #246] 目前发现r1版本深度思考会把思考过程全部展现,能否加个rule规则功能默认可以设置开或者关闭 #180
Labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1#180
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @maojianyou on GitHub (Feb 3, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1/issues/246
问题1、比如标签部分,有时候觉得思考太繁琐了,根本不想看到思考过程,我只需要正确的答案,除非发现它回答问题不是我想要的答案后,我才会关注它思考过程,一般泛化的问题,根本不需要思考过程,不然看着一堆分析文字,到最后还不是想要的结果,想死的心都有
问题2、目前deepseek-r1 如果本地化私有部署,有没有算力参考资料,或者服务器显卡,内存等要求,主要想通过api接入翻译软件app,手机临时测了一下deepseek-r1:1.5b,发现很弱智
问题3、对比claude3.5 sonnet 跟 gpt-4o 都能支持详细识别图片内容,这个目前不支持真的很可惜
@High-cla commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2025):
手机可以跑8b
@NekoSunflower commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2025):
R1模型的效果来源于其深度思考,就算你不想看到思考内容不展示,也会长时间等待在空白页面,并不会立即看到你想要的”结果“,或者说它输出的思考内容其实也是其”结果“的一部分。
@xueshuai0922 commented on GitHub (Feb 7, 2025):
如果这样的话,就证明你的使用场景不适合这个模型,换V3
@Alphayellowcat commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2025):
写连接的时候加一个选项要不要显示思考过程,比如以下代码:
@maojianyou commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2025):
这个效率太低了,输出慢,感觉思考半天,答案其实很简单,而且一堆文字非常有审美疲劳
@High-cla commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2025):
就跟你思考问题一样,你嘴里说出来的和脑海里想的并不是完全一样吧,就算不输出,你也得等大半天时间并不会节省
@yefl2064 commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2025):
自己把输出内容处理一下, 不显示think部分内容就可以了
@sybest1259 commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025):
没有相关配置参数能关闭思考过程吗?
@pkghealth commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2025):
Ask it to code a hidden script or hidden wrapper for the [{ < think > reasoning < think /> }] you could probably even convince it to script a show function also. Just like linux command { ls -alh }
Good luck
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 8, 2025):
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please leave a comment to keep it open. Thank you for your contributions!
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 31, 2025):
false