mirror of
https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1.git
synced 2026-11-05 00:47:42 +00:00
[GH-ISSUE #67] Feature Request: Implement Session Memory/Persistent Context #55
Labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1#55
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @prdai on GitHub (Jan 24, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1/issues/67
Hi,
I’d like to propose adding persistent memory/session context functionality to DeepSeek-R1, similar to ChatGPT’s ability to retain conversation history and user-specific preferences across interactions. This would significantly enhance usability for developers and end-users by:
Current Limitation:
As of now, DeepSeek-R1 resets context after each session, requiring users to re-provide information in every new interaction.
Proposed Solution:
enable_memory=True,reset_memory()).Why This Matters:
Additional Context:
Thanks!
@justinlietz93 commented on GitHub (Jan 25, 2025):
I am currently working on a kit for this right now. I have a suite of tools for Deepseek r1 on my GitHub and I’m implementing permanent memory / context management soon. Can you email me your thoughts and suggestions so I can help build this?
@tommykmusic commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2025):
This would be amazing, also it would be nice to be able to export our memory bank from ChatGPT to DeepSeek! This would make it easier to transition from ChatGPT etc.
@BenRacicot commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2025):
If we could get it to watch a local Github repo's changes, to keep it in context, that would be incredible.
@justinlietz93 commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2025):
I am very close to finishing my next big merge to main, I am a full time student and full time software engineer, but believe me I am using every bit of time to continue this project, feel free to follow my page for updates on the agent_tools repo
@WillyamBradberry commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2025):
Agree with that. The most wanted feature
@feeleen commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2025):
It aso has to store and index all previous communications in a text form in a DB, and fine tune(retrain) itself with this daily chat data everyday (like we do when we sleep at night).
So I could say: "remind me what we discussed two weeks ago on tuesday"
and it should tell me the exact dialog parts related to prompt or summarize it
@justinlietz93 commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2025):
This is something I am actively working on.
Right now I have a fully autonomous system that lets either a local ollama deepseek, or any API run indefinitely until a goal is achieved. Think of a complex project that might require days of 24/7 development from an AI to finish a prototype or concept.
The system currently uses a rolling context window extender that shows the LLM where it previously left off, it's also capable of using and building its own tools at runtime.
The LLM can prompt itself, as well as prompt other agents to carry out tasks. It can browse the web, use your computer, write code, run shell commands, etc.
I am working on making this stable and creating permanent memory at the moment as well as exploring ideas for fine tuning on your context and codebase
@aandriamgit commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2025):
my bro, that hella impressive, at this point just make it operate a paperclip factory
@ChromiaCat commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2025):
This would be an awesome feature to add to the web version of R1, last night I hit the chat limit & I couldn't get DeepSeek to either reference that chat or upload the chat as a file(it can't read all of it in file form) so this would be very useful.
Is there an estimate as to when will it be implemented on the site?
@Saisankarwork123 commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2025):
Highly excited about this. Kudos to you, man.
@jackbab0 commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2025):
For my academic research something like this would be huge, so eventually notice me if there are any updates!
Good luck with everything
@mercmobily commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2025):
I can't express how helpful this would be. Sorry about the noise.
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2025):
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please leave a comment to keep it open. Thank you for your contributions!
@mercmobily commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2025):
Please don't close this issue!
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 14, 2025):
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please leave a comment to keep it open. Thank you for your contributions!
@AlyaGomaa commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2025):
Hey any updates about this issue??
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2025):
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please leave a comment to keep it open. Thank you for your contributions!
@the-hottest-bulb commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2025):
This issue is very much still relevent, the only reason I haven't switched to deepseek from ChatGPT is because of this missing feature. For power users this is a key issue and is definitely whats keeping many users from switching to it.
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Sep 27, 2025):
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please leave a comment to keep it open. Thank you for your contributions!
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 11, 2025):
false