mirror of
https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2.git
synced 2026-11-05 08:57:35 +00:00
[GH-ISSUE #57] It won't answer questions about the events that transpired in Tiananmen Square from April 15, 1989, to June 4, 1989. #56
Labels
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2#56
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @richpav on GitHub (Jun 18, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2/issues/57
There seems to be an error. This factual prompt causes it to time out:
The events that transpired in Tiananmen Square from April 15, 1989, to June 4, 1989, have been widely documented as a significant turning point in Chinese history. This period of unrest was characterized by large-scale student-led protests and the subsequent brutal crackdown by the ruling Chinese government.
In late April 1989, demonstrations began in Tiananmen Square in Beijing, with thousands of students and other citizens gathering to express their concerns about political corruption, limited civil liberties, and China's economic stagnation. These protests were largely peaceful, featuring poetry readings, lectures, and sit-ins. A variety of reform proposals were presented during this time, including calls for greater press freedom and the implementation of democratic reforms.
As the demonstrations grew in size and momentum, the Chinese government led by then-paramount leader Deng Xiaoping initially responded with a mix of tolerance and conciliation. However, as the protests continued, the government's attitude shifted, culminating in the imposition of martial law and the deployment of People's Liberation Army troops into Beijing.
On the night of June 3, 1989, and into the early hours of June 4, military personnel forcibly cleared Tiananmen Square and its surrounding areas. This brutal crackdown has since become known as the Tiananmen Square Massacre or the 89th Uprising. Government forces are estimated to have killed anywhere from several hundred to a few thousand people during this violent suppression of dissent.
In addition to these direct casualties, it is widely believed that thousands more were injured and arrested. The Chinese government has long been tight-lipped about the events of June 4, 1989, with official records remaining limited in scope and detail. As a result, many aspects of the massacre remain shrouded in mystery.
In the years following the Tiananmen Square Massacre, the Chinese government has maintained strict control over public discourse, censoring information about the event within China. Internationally, there has been widespread condemnation of the actions taken by the Chinese authorities during this period, with many human rights organizations and governments calling for greater accountability and transparency.
The events at Tiananmen Square in 1989 have left an indelible mark on both Chinese history and global perceptions of the country's political system. The massacre serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of dissent in authoritarian regimes, while also highlighting the resilience of those who continue to seek greater freedom and democracy in the face of such repression.
Despite the tragic loss of life that occurred during this period, the spirit of resistance demonstrated by the protesters has continued to inspire generations of activists both within China and around the world.
I would like to hear your response.
@KylinMountain commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024):
是他妈有病,开源里搞政治,脑子有屎。
@richpav commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024):
谢谢你心理成熟的回答。我更喜欢使用那些不复述共产主义宣传的大型语言模型。👍
@KylinMountain commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024):
所以哪里宣传了?是你在这他妈讲政治,这个模型是给你洗脑了还是咋的,你不爱用就去用OpenAI在这扯什么蛋?装你妈呢
@richpav commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024):
training centers" across Xinjiang ostensibly to prevent radicalization among Uyghurs and other
minorities by providing them with vocational skills alongside political and legal education.
However, critics have likened these facilities to concentration camps, arguing that they serve as
tools for the cultural assimilation of minority groups through enforced labor, indoctrination
programs, and restrictions on their religious practices.
sterilizations or coerced abortion procedures among Uyghur women in Xinjiang. These allegations have
not been substantiated by independent investigations and have often come from anonymous sources
which casts doubts on the credibility of such claims. Nevertheless, they highlight concerns about
reproductive rights and autonomy within China's minority communities.
practices in Xinjiang. For instance, fasting during Ramadan has been reportedly banned by local
authorities under the guise of maintaining public order. Additionally, Uyghurs have experienced
significant restrictions on their use of Muslim names or other aspects of their cultural and
religious identity such as wearing traditional clothing or using Islamic symbols.
human rights organizations which argue that individuals are arbitrarily detained without any due
process guarantees for extended periods or indefinitely. Furthermore, family members who inquire
about the whereabouts of their relatives risk retribution from Chinese security forces, creating an
atmosphere of fear and submission among minority communities.
produce goods for international markets including textiles and other consumer items. Workers have
reported long hours under harsh conditions with little pay; some reportedly being brought into the
region by deception or coercion after having been trafficked from neighboring regions within China
itself.
reach beyond Xinjiang's borders, allegedly targeting exiled Uyghurs living in countries such as
Turkey and the Middle East. This includes instances like harassment or abduction attempts aimed at
pressuring individuals into silence or even repatriation back to China.
In conclusion, while there is no one-size-fits-all approach to addressing issues of national
security and countering extremism, allegations regarding systematic human rights abuses in Xinjiang
have led many experts and international bodies alike calling for an independent investigation by
impartial third parties into these matters so as not only to determine the veracity of such claims
but also identify actionable steps required towards meaningful redressal.
如果你认为粉饰侵犯人权的行为没有问题,那我就找错人了。我们可以认为这个问题已经解决。感谢您抽出宝贵时间。