[GH-ISSUE #236] Can RLHF even simpler to maximize the expectation of rewards? #69

Closed
opened 2026-10-26 21:12:50 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @kindernerd on GitHub (Jan 7, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/issues/236

GRPO simplifies advantage to (r-mean)/std, i'm wondering whether RLHF can even be simpler by directly maximum the following objective:
\sum_o\pi_{\theta}(o|q)[r_o - E(r_o|q)]
which can be approximated by sampling or using the N-best Lists
\sum_{o_i\in \pi_{old}}\pi_{\theta}(o_i|q)[r_{o_i} -mean(r)]
this is similar to sequence training (MWER) in e2e asr optimization, proposed by google in this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01818

Originally created by @kindernerd on GitHub (Jan 7, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/issues/236 GRPO simplifies advantage to (r-mean)/std, i'm wondering whether RLHF can even be simpler by directly maximum the following objective: $\sum_o\pi_{\theta}(o|q)[r_o - E(r_o|q)]$ which can be approximated by sampling or using the N-best Lists $\sum_{o_i\in \pi_{old}}\pi_{\theta}(o_i|q)[r_{o_i} -mean(r)]$ this is similar to sequence training (MWER) in e2e asr optimization, proposed by google in this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01818
bsakaguchi 2026-10-26 21:12:50 +00:00
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2025):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please leave a comment to keep it open. Thank you for your contributions!

<!-- gh-comment-id:2644719718 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2025): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please leave a comment to keep it open. Thank you for your contributions!
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2025):

false

<!-- gh-comment-id:2677207791 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2025): false
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3#69
No description provided.