Add GitHub data: filename sanitization (#640)

github-data/pull_requests/176 - Deepseek V3 support added.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+### 🔀 [#176](https://github.com/ikawrakow/ik_llama.cpp/pull/176) - Deepseek V3 support added
+
+| **Author** | `saood06` |
+| :--- | :--- |
+| **State** | ❌ **Closed** |
+| **Created** | 2025-01-23 |
+| **Updated** | 2025-01-23 |
+
+---
+
+#### Description
+
+Very direct port of https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/11049.
+
+Tested working with IQ4_K_R4 and IQ4_K. No tests so far on any quant that is supported by llama.cpp so that performance can be compared.
+
+Tested on dual socket Xeon E5-2690 v3
+Prompt processing:11.5 t/s for IQ4_K, 9.8 t/s IQ4_K_R4
+Token generation: 2.75 t/s for IQ4_K, 3.10 t/s for IQ4_K_R4
+
+- [x] I have read the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
+- Self-reported review complexity:
+  - [X] Low
+  - [ ] Medium
+  - [ ] High
+
+---
+
+#### 💬 Conversation
+
+👤 **ikawrakow** submitted a review the **2025-01-23** at **16:09:41**: ✅ `APPROVED`
+
+---
+
+👤 **ikawrakow** commented the **2025-01-23** at **17:00:50**:<br>
+
+@saood06 
+
+Quick question: current `llama.cpp` has this check for Deepseek-V3:
+```c++
+    } else if (tmpl_contains(LU8("<｜Assistant｜>")) && tmpl_contains(LU8("<｜User｜>")) && tmpl_contains(LU8("<｜end▁of▁sentence｜>"))) {
+        return LLM_CHAT_TEMPLATE_DEEPSEEK_3;
+```
+while the check you added with this PR is
+```c++
+    else if (tmpl == "deepseek3" || tmpl_contains(LU8("'<｜Assistant｜>' + message['content'] + '<｜end▁of▁sentence｜>'"))) {
+```
+The check for `tmpl == "deepseek3"` is done before in `llama.cpp`, so this is not an issue, but the remainder is not the same. Is this a problem? Or would it be a problem if I just made it the same as `llama.cpp` ?
+
+---
+
+👤 **saood06** commented the **2025-01-23** at **18:00:03**:<br>
+
+The change you are referencing happened in https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/commit/ec7f3ac9ab33e46b136eb5ab6a76c4d81f57c7f1 I was not aware of that till now.
+
+
+>Is this a problem? Or would it be a problem if I just made it the same as llama.cpp ?
+
+ You can change it if you want but both work, based on the chat_templates for the models that have been released.