Add GitHub data: filename sanitization (#640)

github-data/pull_requests/225 - Examples _ Add new sweep-bench benchmark.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+### 🔀 [#225](https://github.com/ikawrakow/ik_llama.cpp/pull/225) -  Examples : Add new sweep-bench benchmark
+
+| **Author** | `saood06` |
+| :--- | :--- |
+| **State** | ❌ **Closed** |
+| **Created** | 2025-02-23 |
+| **Updated** | 2025-04-26 |
+
+---
+
+#### Description
+
+Port of https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/commit/9488fbf1e4334b8f189b38a7d224b8e6c1a7b22b
+
+This is a good tool to benchmark with as requested by #223. 
+
+As a very quick demo I generated this, just by running this ( ```./llama-sweep-bench -c 2048 -ub 512 -m  WizardLM-2-8x22B-IQ4_K_R4.gguf -ctk q8_KV -ctv q8_0 -fa --output-format jsonl ``` and then sweep-bench-plot.py with the output).
+
+![performance_comparison_pp](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4a53b14d-d6a1-4e3a-99ac-5c3802c1e044)
+
+![performance_comparison_tg](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b8b3cd9a-675d-415a-89b4-e334ed6ab825)
+
+- Self-reported review complexity:
+  - [X] Low
+  - [ ] Medium
+  - [ ] High
+
+---
+
+#### 💬 Conversation
+
+👤 **ikawrakow** submitted a review the **2025-02-23** at **06:00:18**: ✅ `APPROVED`<br>
+
+Thank you for this - can be very useful.
+
+---
+
+👤 **ubergarm** commented the **2025-04-26** at **18:01:12**:<br>
+
+@saood06 thanks I'm a convert to `llama-sweep-bench`! It is indeed very useful.
+
+I pushed a branch on my personal mainline llama.cpp fork just to use for testing performance across forks. I don't plan to open a PR to mainline, but just left it up there in case anyone else is using it. I'm guessing ik has something similar as we were comparing the new GLM-4 performance. 
+
+Thanks!