Add GitHub data: filename sanitization (#640)

This commit is contained in:
Thomas
2025-07-23 13:31:53 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 3600d82e98
commit eaa2510a28
626 changed files with 0 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
### 🔀 [#73](https://github.com/ikawrakow/ik_llama.cpp/pull/73) - CUDA: faster float -> iq4_nl conversion
| **Author** | `ikawrakow` |
| :--- | :--- |
| **State** | ❌ **Closed** |
| **Created** | 2024-10-01 |
| **Updated** | 2024-10-01 |
---
#### Description
I had forgotten that `IQ4_NL` can be used for kv-cache on CUDA. It can be, but it is slower than `fp16, q4_0, ...`.
This PR speeds up the CUDA `IQ4_NL` quantization. The following table shows a performance comparison between the main branch and this PR for LLaMA-3.1-8B with FA enabled and `IQ4_NL` cache running on RTX-4080
| model | type_k | type_v | test | t/s (main) | t/s (PR) | Speedup |
| --------------- | -----: | -----: | ------------: | ---------------: | --------------: | -------: |
| llama 8B Q4_K_S | iq4_nl | iq4_nl | pp512 | 6933.65 ± 14.39 | 7274.27 ± 13.54 | 1.049 |
| llama 8B Q4_K_S | iq4_nl | iq4_nl | pp8192 | 5557.13 ± 1.59 | 5771.27 ± 6.53 | 1.039 |
| llama 8B Q4_K_S | iq4_nl | iq4_nl | pp32768 | 3300.51 ± 3.99 | 3372.49 ± 4.25 | 1.022 |
In comparison, `PP(512, Q4_0) = 7389.61` and `PP(32768, Q4_0) = 3409.85`, so `IQ4_NL` is 1.6% / 1.1% slower after the PR, which I think is an acceptable tradeoff given the improved accuracy:
```
PPL(Q4_0) = 6.7648
PPL(IQ4_NL) = 6.6992
```
The `IQ4_NL` result is comparable to `Q4_1` kv-cache, which is 11% larger.
Note that the CUDA `IQ4_NL` quantization method is not the same as the one used when quantizing models. It must be fast else the performance penalty would be too large. Thus, kv-cache `IQ4_NL` quantization quality is not as good as when quantizing model weights, and hence we can only get to `Q4_1`quantization quality.