mirror of
https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake.git
synced 2026-11-05 01:17:55 +00:00
[GH-ISSUE #901] [Usage]: mooncake的优势在哪? #284
Labels
No labels
ascend
auto-closed
bug
bug
CI/Build
Common
documentation
enhancement
feature request
good first issue
help wanted
high priority
MetaX
nightly-failure
pull-request
PyTorch Backend
question
RFC
Roadmap
stale
Store
Tests
Transfer Engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
kvcache-ai/Mooncake#284
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @lijufeng2016 on GitHub (Sep 29, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/issues/901
Describe your usage question
VLLM_USE_V1=0
nohup python3 -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server
--model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
--served-model-name Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
--port 8100
--max-model-len 10000
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.92
--max-num-seqs 64
--max-num-batched-tokens 32768
evalscope perf
--api openai
--url http://127.0.0.1:8088/v1/completions
--model "Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct"
--tokenizer-path Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
--dataset openqa
--parallel 100
--number 400
--max-tokens 1024
--temperature 0.0
--extra-args '{"ignore_eos": true}'
上面我的vllm启动命令和压测命令,总共3个节点做kv_both节点,没有使用mooncake的情况下,3个节点做了负载均衡的请求代理,模型是Qwen2.5-7B,数据集是openqa;
然后测试使用mooncake,一台kv_both,两台单独的decoder,测之前做了大量的预热,给足了了DRAM内存,最后测试的结果并没有前面不使用mooncake的好,这是为什么?
或者说,什么情况下,能体现mooncake的优势?
Before submitting a new issue...
@lijufeng2016 commented on GitHub (Sep 29, 2025):
想要知道mooncake的正确使用姿势,比如参数不对?还是模型不对?还是数据集不对?
@alogfans commented on GitHub (Oct 13, 2025):
PD分离模式的性能不一定优于非PD分离模式,这是因为前者在关键路径上有数据传输需求。我们试验后发现一般需要(包括但不限于)下列条件:
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jun 27, 2026):
This issue has had no activity for 90 days and will be closed in 7 days if there is no further activity. Please comment or react if it should stay open.
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 5, 2026):
Closing due to 3 months of inactivity. If this is still relevant, please comment and we can reopen.