[PR #4726] [MERGED] docs(skills): capture measured analysis optimization workflow #6371

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-10-31 01:13:58 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 0 comments

bsakaguchi commented

2026-10-31 01:13:58 +00:00

Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/morluto/rea/pull/4726
Author: @N0zoM1z0
Created: 10/17/2026
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 10/17/2026
Merged by: @N0zoM1z0

Base: main ← Head: docs/rea-analysis-optimization-skill-20261017

📝 Commits (1)

471769c docs(skills): capture measured analysis optimization workflow

📊 Changes

4 files changed (+232 additions, -0 deletions)

View changed files

➕ .agents/skills/rea-analysis-optimization/SKILL.md (+113 -0)
➕ .agents/skills/rea-analysis-optimization/agents/openai.yaml (+4 -0)
➕ .agents/skills/rea-analysis-optimization/references/kuna-case-study.md (+112 -0)
📝 CONTRIBUTING.md (+3 -0)

📄 Description

Summary

Kuna optimization decisions and measurements were scattered across PRs and experiments. Add rea-analysis-optimization, a contributor skill for finding provider/shared-workflow bottlenecks, preserving Evidence and cache ownership, and comparing equivalent completed investigations. Link it from CONTRIBUTING.

The short entrypoint routes to an optional Kuna case study with pinned revisions, real-workflow measurements, and explicit limits: the ~5.5x warm-lookup improvement establishes no whole-task, memory, token, or agent-quality improvement. Experimental native query/byte work remains labeled experimental.

Scope

Documentation and skill discovery metadata only. No runtime, CLI/MCP contract, provider, packaged analysis skill, or generated-output changes. Additional target-execution scope approval is not applicable. Requested directly by the human owner; no separate issue needed.

Validation

Skill creator validator, local link destinations, UI YAML, changed-file formatting, and git diff --check: passed.
npm run docs:check: passed, including 5 consistency tests.
npm exec -- turbo run lint:built format:check knip metadata:check --concurrency=1: passed; npm run verify:architecture-guards: passed.
npm run check: incomplete. Root TypeScript checking reached the 3.25 GiB early memory guard and was stopped (last observed OOM/kill counters zero). It is not reported as passing. The push hook's repeat of this full typecheck is omitted after that resource stop; hosted checks remain required.

Heavy local tasks used one CPU and a 4 GiB process-family hard limit. Documentation checking completed in 99.75 s wall / 98.60 s CPU with a 2.77 GiB kernel family peak including cache; payload cleanup and zero OOM events were verified. No new native-provider benchmark or independent model-use evaluation was run for this documentation change; the case study identifies its historical evidence and limits.

Hosted validation

Current-head CI passed on 471769c45a0268fb9f07bbdc5159cd1f799e2cea: static checks including typecheck, source tests, all five compiled test shards, build, docs generation, Linux native package baseline, portable tests, and the required gate. Greptile review passed (5/5), with no inline comments or unresolved review threads. Codex review was unavailable because the repository review quota was exhausted; it did not produce a code finding.

The six historical LLVM benchmark logs were re-read to verify the case study's medians, 28-read workload, equal result digests, and resource observations. This was a check of recorded data, not a new performance trial.

Author readiness

Human owner: @N0zoM1z0

Declarations are entered by the agent at the human owner’s explicit direction. Diff and evidence checks reported here were performed by the agent; this does not assert a separately observed human review.

I reviewed the final diff and relevant existing code, understand the change and its edge cases, and take responsibility for the complete PR, including AI-assisted work.
I checked the evidence above, confirmed it supports the current change, and recorded meaningful validation gaps.
I declare this PR ready for initial maintainer review.

_{🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.}

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/morluto/rea/pull/4726 **Author:** [@N0zoM1z0](https://github.com/N0zoM1z0) **Created:** 10/17/2026 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 10/17/2026 **Merged by:** [@N0zoM1z0](https://github.com/N0zoM1z0) **Base:** `main` ← **Head:** `docs/rea-analysis-optimization-skill-20261017` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`471769c`](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/471769c45a0268fb9f07bbdc5159cd1f799e2cea) docs(skills): capture measured analysis optimization workflow ### 📊 Changes **4 files changed** (+232 additions, -0 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> ➕ `.agents/skills/rea-analysis-optimization/SKILL.md` (+113 -0) ➕ `.agents/skills/rea-analysis-optimization/agents/openai.yaml` (+4 -0) ➕ `.agents/skills/rea-analysis-optimization/references/kuna-case-study.md` (+112 -0) 📝 `CONTRIBUTING.md` (+3 -0) </details> ### 📄 Description ## Summary Kuna optimization decisions and measurements were scattered across PRs and experiments. Add `rea-analysis-optimization`, a contributor skill for finding provider/shared-workflow bottlenecks, preserving Evidence and cache ownership, and comparing equivalent completed investigations. Link it from CONTRIBUTING. The short entrypoint routes to an optional Kuna case study with pinned revisions, real-workflow measurements, and explicit limits: the ~5.5x warm-lookup improvement establishes no whole-task, memory, token, or agent-quality improvement. Experimental native query/byte work remains labeled experimental. ## Scope Documentation and skill discovery metadata only. No runtime, CLI/MCP contract, provider, packaged analysis skill, or generated-output changes. Additional target-execution scope approval is not applicable. Requested directly by the human owner; no separate issue needed. ## Validation - Skill creator validator, local link destinations, UI YAML, changed-file formatting, and `git diff --check`: passed. - `npm run docs:check`: passed, including 5 consistency tests. - `npm exec -- turbo run lint:built format:check knip metadata:check --concurrency=1`: passed; `npm run verify:architecture-guards`: passed. - `npm run check`: **incomplete**. Root TypeScript checking reached the 3.25 GiB early memory guard and was stopped (last observed OOM/kill counters zero). It is not reported as passing. The push hook's repeat of this full typecheck is omitted after that resource stop; hosted checks remain required. Heavy local tasks used one CPU and a 4 GiB process-family hard limit. Documentation checking completed in 99.75 s wall / 98.60 s CPU with a 2.77 GiB kernel family peak including cache; payload cleanup and zero OOM events were verified. No new native-provider benchmark or independent model-use evaluation was run for this documentation change; the case study identifies its historical evidence and limits. ## Hosted validation [Current-head CI](https://github.com/morluto/rea/actions/runs/39016977396) passed on `471769c45a0268fb9f07bbdc5159cd1f799e2cea`: static checks including typecheck, source tests, all five compiled test shards, build, docs generation, Linux native package baseline, portable tests, and the required gate. Greptile review passed (5/5), with no inline comments or unresolved review threads. Codex review was unavailable because the repository review quota was exhausted; it did not produce a code finding. The six historical LLVM benchmark logs were re-read to verify the case study's medians, 28-read workload, equal result digests, and resource observations. This was a check of recorded data, not a new performance trial. ## Author readiness Human owner: @N0zoM1z0 Declarations are entered by the agent at the human owner’s explicit direction. Diff and evidence checks reported here were performed by the agent; this does not assert a separately observed human review. - [x] I reviewed the final diff and relevant existing code, understand the change and its edge cases, and take responsibility for the complete PR, including AI-assisted work. - [x] I checked the evidence above, confirmed it supports the current change, and recorded meaningful validation gaps. - [x] I declare this PR ready for initial maintainer review. --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>

bsakaguchi

2026-10-31 01:13:58 +00:00