[PR #6263] [CLOSED] docs(browser): explain destination-dependent case isolation in script export #7237

Closed
opened 2026-11-01 21:46:23 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 0 comments
Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/morluto/rea/pull/6263
Author: @SahinurDEV
Created: 10/22/2026
Status: ❌ Closed

Base: main ← Head: docs/6242-case-isolation


📝 Commits (1)

  • 697487f docs(browser): explain destination-dependent case isolation in script export

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+12 additions, -4 deletions)

View changed files

📝 docs/website-script-export.md (+12 -4)

📄 Description

Summary

Fixes #6242. Clarifies in docs/website-script-export.md that case isolation in script export depends on the export destination, so readers know when cases are kept separate and when they are not.

Problem and expected behavior

The last "Sources and mappings" bullet described case handling as if it were uniform; the actual behavior depends on where the script is exported.

Change and scope

Documentation only: splits that bullet so destination-dependent case isolation is explained explicitly. No code changes.

Contract and boundary impact

  • Semantic owner and earliest changed stage: docs only

  • Contribution scope fit and linked maintainer decision: not applicable (docs fix, issue #6242)

  • CLI and MCP/tool-catalog contract: none

  • Provider, bridge, target-format, or platform compatibility: none

  • Evidence, artifact, provenance, or reconstruction contract: none

  • Target selection, authority, upstream behavior, and cleanup details (if applicable): not applicable

  • Generated metadata, package, or installation impact: none

  • Documentation or usability only; no target interaction.

Evidence and regression coverage

  • Tests added or updated: none (docs only)
  • Base reproduction or other evidence: source-derived from the script export implementation
  • User-visible CLI/MCP output (if applicable): not applicable
  • Remaining proof gaps: none known

Validation performed

  • npm run docs:check — pass (9/9)
  • npm run format:check — pass

Compatibility, safety, and release

  • Breaking changes or migration steps: none
  • Real Hopper/Ghidra, browser, or OS coverage: not applicable
  • Package or release metadata impact: none
  • Security, privacy, process, or containment review: not applicable

Author readiness

Human owner: @SahinurDEV

  • I reviewed the final diff and relevant existing code, understand the change and its edge cases, and take responsibility for the complete PR, including AI-assisted work.
  • I checked the evidence above, confirmed it supports the current change, and recorded meaningful validation gaps.
  • I declare this PR ready for initial maintainer review.

Before merge

  • This PR addresses a concrete problem or an agreed enhancement.
  • Material scope and authority questions are resolved, and any required maintainer scope decision covers the final diff.
  • The PR has one focused outcome and the title follows type(scope): outcome.
  • Related issue is linked, or the reason for not linking one is stated above.
  • Tests cover changed observable behavior and meaningful failure paths.
  • Owning docs, contracts, and generated metadata are updated where needed.
  • User-visible CLI/MCP changes include representative output.
  • I checked the final diff for secrets, unrelated cleanup, and unsupported claims.

🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/morluto/rea/pull/6263 **Author:** [@SahinurDEV](https://github.com/SahinurDEV) **Created:** 10/22/2026 **Status:** ❌ Closed **Base:** `main` ← **Head:** `docs/6242-case-isolation` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`697487f`](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/697487ff0b9ed31a2b15af74bb885fd4022a3b5f) docs(browser): explain destination-dependent case isolation in script export ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+12 additions, -4 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `docs/website-script-export.md` (+12 -4) </details> ### 📄 Description ## Summary Fixes #6242. Clarifies in `docs/website-script-export.md` that case isolation in script export depends on the export destination, so readers know when cases are kept separate and when they are not. ## Problem and expected behavior The last "Sources and mappings" bullet described case handling as if it were uniform; the actual behavior depends on where the script is exported. ## Change and scope Documentation only: splits that bullet so destination-dependent case isolation is explained explicitly. No code changes. ## Contract and boundary impact - Semantic owner and earliest changed stage: docs only - Contribution scope fit and linked maintainer decision: not applicable (docs fix, issue #6242) - CLI and MCP/tool-catalog contract: none - Provider, bridge, target-format, or platform compatibility: none - Evidence, artifact, provenance, or reconstruction contract: none - Target selection, authority, upstream behavior, and cleanup details (if applicable): not applicable - Generated metadata, package, or installation impact: none - [x] Documentation or usability only; no target interaction. ## Evidence and regression coverage - Tests added or updated: none (docs only) - Base reproduction or other evidence: source-derived from the script export implementation - User-visible CLI/MCP output (if applicable): not applicable - Remaining proof gaps: none known ## Validation performed - `npm run docs:check` — pass (9/9) - `npm run format:check` — pass ## Compatibility, safety, and release - Breaking changes or migration steps: none - Real Hopper/Ghidra, browser, or OS coverage: not applicable - Package or release metadata impact: none - Security, privacy, process, or containment review: not applicable ## Author readiness Human owner: @SahinurDEV - [ ] I reviewed the final diff and relevant existing code, understand the change and its edge cases, and take responsibility for the complete PR, including AI-assisted work. - [ ] I checked the evidence above, confirmed it supports the current change, and recorded meaningful validation gaps. - [ ] I declare this PR ready for initial maintainer review. ## Before merge - [ ] This PR addresses a concrete problem or an agreed enhancement. - [ ] Material scope and authority questions are resolved, and any required maintainer scope decision covers the final diff. - [ ] The PR has one focused outcome and the title follows `type(scope): outcome`. - [ ] Related issue is linked, or the reason for not linking one is stated above. - [ ] Tests cover changed observable behavior and meaningful failure paths. - [ ] Owning docs, contracts, and generated metadata are updated where needed. - [ ] User-visible CLI/MCP changes include representative output. - [ ] I checked the final diff for secrets, unrelated cleanup, and unsupported claims. --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>
bsakaguchi 2026-11-01 21:46:23 +00:00
bsakaguchi changed title from [PR #6263] [CLOSED] docs(browser): explain destination-dependent case isolation in script export to [PR #6263] docs(browser): explain destination-dependent case isolation in script export 2026-11-03 15:41:41 +00:00
bsakaguchi changed title from [PR #6263] docs(browser): explain destination-dependent case isolation in script export to [PR #6263] [CLOSED] docs(browser): explain destination-dependent case isolation in script export 2026-11-03 16:43:12 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
morluto/rea#7237
No description provided.