mirror of
https://github.com/open-webui/computer.git
synced 2026-11-05 01:17:24 +00:00
[GH-ISSUE #175] issue: extremely bad contrast #95
Labels
No labels
enhancement
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
open-webui/computer#95
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Classic298 on GitHub (Jul 26, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/computer/issues/175
input field of my message absolutely indistinguisable from assistant
@owui-terminator[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2026):
🔍 Related Issues Found
I found some existing issues that might be related. Please check if any of these are duplicates or contain helpful solutions:
🟣 #151 bug: Borders less pronounced in newest version, making layout sections hard to distinguish
This is the closest match: it reports that borders and section separation became too subtle due to low contrast, making the UI hard to distinguish. The new issue is also about insufficient contrast between the message input and assistant area.
by JKGeovision
🟣 #91 Desktop UX: contrast, scaling, and git worktree discovery
This earlier issue explicitly mentions the dark theme having missing contrast and difficulty differentiating layout elements. It overlaps with the same general UX/accessibility problem of low contrast in the desktop UI.
by JKGeovision
🟢 #172 feat: Add built-in theme customization
This feature request is about adding theme customization, motivated in part by poor default contrast and the need to adjust app colors for accessibility. It is related because a theme system would address the type of contrast problem raised in the new issue.
by JKGeovision
💡 If your issue is a duplicate, please close it and add any additional details to the existing issue instead.
This comment was generated automatically. React with 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.
@tjbck commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2026):
#187