[GH-ISSUE #366] Disable Pipelines for Task Models #166

New issue

Open

opened 2026-10-18 21:03:16 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 2 comments

bsakaguchi commented

2026-10-18 21:03:16 +00:00

Owner

Originally created by @darebfh on GitHub (Dec 12, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/pipelines/issues/366

Feature Request

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I monitor usage statistics using langfuse and the associated pipeline. However, in langfuse also all requests from task models show up and there is no way of filtering these requests from tasks models.

Describe the solution you'd like
I suggest adding a checkbox to the "Pipelines" page in the Admin settings called "include task models". This should be deactived by default.

Describe alternatives you've considered
It would be possible to set the "Pipelines" parameter with the pipeline definition file to the specific models to monitor. Currently, this parameter is set to "*" as I do not know the identifiers of task model pipelines.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Originally created by @darebfh on GitHub (Dec 12, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/open-webui/pipelines/issues/366 # Feature Request **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** I monitor usage statistics using langfuse and the associated pipeline. However, in langfuse also all requests from task models show up and there is no way of filtering these requests from tasks models. **Describe the solution you'd like** I suggest adding a checkbox to the "Pipelines" page in the Admin settings called "include task models". This should be deactived by default. **Describe alternatives you've considered** It would be possible to set the "Pipelines" parameter with the pipeline definition file to the specific models to monitor. Currently, this parameter is set to "*" as I do not know the identifiers of task model pipelines. **Additional context** Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

bsakaguchi commented

2026-10-18 21:03:16 +00:00

Author

Owner

@audrzejq commented on GitHub (Jan 10, 2025):

That would be good! Thanks for this report!

@audrzejq commented on GitHub (Jan 10, 2025): That would be good! Thanks for this report!

bsakaguchi commented

2026-10-18 21:03:16 +00:00

Author

Owner

@veleinfobip commented on GitHub (Feb 12, 2025):

Maybe you can add to beginning of inlet and outlet some code, like this:

         if "task" in body.get("metadata", {}):
            mtask = body["metadata"]["task"]
            error_message = f"This is task: {mtask}"
            print(f"Skip: {error_message}")
            return body

@veleinfobip commented on GitHub (Feb 12, 2025): Maybe you can add to beginning of inlet and outlet some code, like this: ``` if "task" in body.get("metadata", {}): mtask = body["metadata"]["task"] error_message = f"This is task: {mtask}" print(f"Skip: {error_message}") return body ```

bsakaguchi referenced this issue

2026-10-18 21:05:15 +00:00

[PR #179] [MERGED] Refactor Anthropic Manifold for improved reliability #348