## Summary
Addresses feedback from the initial v2 node search implementation for
improved UI and UX
## Changes
- **What**:
- add root filter buttons
- remove all extra tree categories leaving only "Most relevant"
- replace input/output selection with popover
- replace price badge with one from node header
- add chevrons and additional styling to category tree
- hide empty categories
- fix bug with hovering selecting item under mouse automatically
- fix tailwind merge with custom sizes removing them
- keyboard navigation
- general tidy/refactor/test
## Screenshots (if applicable)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db798dfa-e248-4b48-bb56-2fa7b6c5f65f
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-9714-feat-Node-search-UX-updates-31f6d73d365081cebd96c4253ad1ca53)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
---------
Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com>
## Summary
Converts 81 package dependencies to use pnpm catalog references for
centralized version management.
## Changes
- **What**: All dependencies matching catalog versions now use
`catalog:` references
- **Dependencies**: axios catalog entry corrected from ^1.11.0 to ^1.8.2
- Also removes a redundant knip config line
### Some things that shouldn't matter
- TypeScript was updated from ^5.4.5 to catalog reference (^5.9.2), but
the project was already resolving to 5.9.2 so this has no practical
impact.
- axios catalog version was corrected from ^1.11.0 back to ^1.8.2 to
match the main package version.
- Autoformatted LGraphNode.ts from another PR by running pnpm lint.
Oops.
## Summary
Split tailwind utils out to a shared package within the monorepo.
## Changes
- Creates `@comfyorg/tailwind-utils` package
- Does not require export, publishing, etc
- Uses `export` to ensure this change does not impact other PRs (many
imports to update)
- If we _want_ to update all imports, there are two commits ready to be
re-applied
- e.g. `git revert 80960c2a82c0d1ac06eee1bb83ac333216b2b376`
## Review Focus
- Is this pattern desirable?
- Should we just include this in a broader design-system split? I kind
of vote yes, but also it's a good small, first step.
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5777-Split-Tailwind-utility-functions-out-to-a-shared-package-2796d73d3650815f976fc73b4fb86ef3)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
