Summary
- Adds playwright.config.ts and playwright.i18n.config.ts to
typescript-eslint projectService.allowDefaultProject in
eslint.config.ts.
Why
- Pre-commit runs lint-staged, which lints staged TypeScript files
including Playwright config files.
- These configs are not included in any tsconfig, so typescript-eslint’s
project service can’t find a project and fails with:
"Parsing error: .../playwright.config.ts was not found by the project
service. Consider either including it in the tsconfig.json or including
it in allowDefaultProject".
What this changes
- Whitelists the two Playwright config files to use the default project
(isolated file parsing) so ESLint can parse and lint them without being
part of a tsconfig.
- Does not affect application code linting, which remains fully
type-aware via existing tsconfigs.
Alternatives considered
- Include these configs in a dedicated ESLint tsconfig (e.g.,
tsconfig.eslint.json) and point ESLint to it.
- Exclude Playwright config files from lint-staged (would reduce lint
coverage for them).
- Keep as TypeScript but non-type-aware: current approach is minimal and
avoids touching tsconfig scopes.
Verification
- Reproduced pre-commit failure when changing playwright.config.ts.
- After this change, `pnpm exec eslint --cache --fix
playwright.config.ts` succeeds.
- `pnpm typecheck` passes.
Notes
- No changes to Playwright runtime behavior. This only affects linting.
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5901-chore-eslint-allow-default-project-for-Playwright-configs-to-fix-pre-commit-linting-2816d73d36508156b94dfeff79a91c7f)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
## Summary
Extracts ComfyUI registry types into a dedicated workspace package for
better modularity.
## Changes
- **What**: Created `@comfyorg/registry-types` package to house
generated type definitions
- **Breaking**: None - maintains backward compatibility through
re-exports at original path
- **Dependencies**: Added `@comfyorg/registry-types` as workspace
dependency
## Review Focus
Is this the right granularity for package extraction, or should registry
types be part of a larger shared package?
PR split into two tiny diffs:
- [Part
one](f8d3d2fa01)
- [Part
two](f8d3d2fa01..c48ca84336)
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5840-Extract-registry-types-into-workspace-package-27c6d73d365081dbb824d680ce739316)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
## Summary
Enforced test file naming conventions with ESLint rules and renamed 26
test files from `.spec.ts` to `.test.ts`.
## Changes
- **What**: Added ESLint rules to enforce `.spec.ts` files only in
`browser_tests/tests/` and `.test.ts` files only in `src/`
- **What**: Renamed 26 component/unit test files from `.spec.ts` to
`.test.ts` to comply with new convention
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5820-enforce-test-file-naming-rule-27b6d73d365081269b32ddcc9d3a5048)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
## Summary
- Added missing directories and files to tsconfig.json to ensure
complete TypeScript type checking coverage
- Expanded config file patterns to include all .mts configuration files
- Verified all 908 TypeScript files in the project are now properly
covered
## Changes
- Added `scripts/**/*.ts` to cover all TypeScript files in scripts
directory (i18n collection, CI/CD scripts)
- Added `build/**/*.ts` to cover customIconCollection.ts and future
build scripts
- Changed `vite.config.mts` to `*.config.mts` to include all vite config
files (vite.electron.config.mts, vite.types.config.mts)
## Test plan
- [x] Run `pnpm typecheck` to verify no TypeScript errors
- [x] Verified all TypeScript files are covered by tsconfig patterns
- [x] browser_tests/ directory confirmed to have its own extending
tsconfig
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5655-chore-tsconfig-ensure-complete-TypeScript-coverage-for-all-project-files-2736d73d36508103acbadc53ca2b2913)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Brown <drjkl@comfy.org>
Co-authored-by: filtered <176114999+webfiltered@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Don't route events up through GraphCanvas if the component itself can
handle the changes
## Changes
- **What**: Reduce the indirect access or action dispatch to
composables/stores.
## Review Focus
The behavior should be either equivalent or a little snappier than
before. Also, the local state in LGraphNode has (almost) all been
removed in favor of reacting to the nodeData prop.
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5709-Refactor-Let-LGraphNode-handle-more-events-itself-2756d73d365081e6a88ce6241bceecc0)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
---------
Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com>
## Summary
Prerequisite refactor/cleanup to use a global store instead of having
nodes throw up events to a parent component that stores a reference to a
singleton service that itself bootstraps and synchronizes with a
separate service to maintain a partially reactive but not fully reactive
set of states that describe some but not all aspects of the nodes on
either the litegraph, the vue side, or both.
## Changes
- **What**: Refactoring, the behavior should not change.
- **Dependencies**: A type utility to help with Vue component props
## Review Focus
Is there something about the current structure that this could affect
that would not be caught by our tests or using the application?
┆Issue is synchronized with this [Notion
page](https://www.notion.so/PR-5695-Refactor-Composable-disentangling-2746d73d365081e6938ce656932f3e36)
by [Unito](https://www.unito.io)
