## Motivation This PR adds ML-based kernel selection heuristics to the CK Tile dispatcher, enabling fast and accurate automatic kernel selection for Universal Gemm kernels. Instead of requiring exhaustive search through 4600+ kernel configurations (taking ~46 seconds per problem shape), the ML heuristic predicts optimal kernels in microseconds while achieving >98% of oracle-best performance. ## Technical Details **ML infrastructure** https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/tree/users/vanantha/ck/dispatcher-heuristics/projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/heuristics * Feature Engine ([feature_engine.py](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/users/vanantha/ck/dispatcher-heuristics/projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/heuristics/feature_engine.py)): 55-feature extraction including problem dimensions, kernel configuration, tile efficiency, and hardware profile * Training Pipeline ([train.py](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/users/vanantha/ck/dispatcher-heuristics/projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/heuristics/train.py)): LightGBM regression with log-transform, GroupKFold cross-validation, warm-start support * Predictor ([predict.py](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/users/vanantha/ck/dispatcher-heuristics/projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/heuristics/predict.py)): Kernel ranking and TFLOPS prediction for problem shapes * Evaluation ([evaluate.py](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/users/vanantha/ck/dispatcher-heuristics/projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/heuristics/evaluate.py)): Comprehensive metrics including efficiency, NDCG@k, shape family analysis **Data Generation Tools:** * [generate_benchmark_data.py](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/users/vanantha/ck/dispatcher-heuristics/projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/heuristics/generate_benchmark_data.py): Build and benchmark kernels across diverse problem shapes * [convert_json_to_parquet.py](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/users/vanantha/ck/dispatcher-heuristics/projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/heuristics/convert_json_to_parquet.py): Convert benchmark JSON to training-ready parquet format * [data_pipeline.py](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/users/vanantha/ck/dispatcher-heuristics/projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/heuristics/data_pipeline.py): Parse streaming benchmark logs into canonical datasets **Examples** * [09_ml_heuristic.cpp](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/users/vanantha/ck/dispatcher-heuristics/projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/examples/gemm/cpp/09_ml_heuristic.cpp): C++ example demonstrating ML-based kernel selection * [09_ml_heuristic.py](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/users/vanantha/ck/dispatcher-heuristics/projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/examples/gemm/python/09_ml_heuristic.py): Python example with validation **Pre-trained Models (projects/composablekernel/dispatcher/heuristics/models/):** * gemm_universal_fp8_gfx950/: fp8 RCR model (42K trees, 97.51% mean efficiency) * gemm_universal_fp16_gfx950/: fp16 RCR model (20K trees, 99.36% mean efficiency) ## Test Plan * Evaluated on 25 diverse shapes for fp16, 168 shapes for fp8 * All shape families tested: tiny M (M<8), small M, medium M, large M (M≥1024) * All pipeline types: compv3, compv4, mem ## Test Result **fp16 Model (gfx950, RCR layout)** * Mean Efficiency: 99.36% * P10 Efficiency: 98.05% (90th percentile of shapes achieve ≥98% of oracle best) * Min Efficiency: 95.45% **fp8 Model (gfx950, RCR layout)** * Mean Efficiency: 98.28% (original), 97.51% (wide coverage) * P10 Efficiency: 94.64% (original), 93.89% (wide coverage) * Min Efficiency: 84.5% ## Submission Checklist - [x ] Look over the contributing guidelines at https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests. --------- Co-authored-by: Vidyasagar Ananthan <vidyasagar.ananthan@amd.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CK Tile Heuristics: ML-Based Kernel Selection
Fast, accurate kernel selection for CK Tile operations using LightGBM regression with Origami-augmented feature engineering.
What This Does
Instead of running all 4608+ kernel configurations on the GPU to find the best one (exhaustive search taking ~46 seconds per shape), this system trains an ML model that predicts TFLOPS for any (problem, kernel) pair in microseconds. It scores all candidates instantly and picks the best kernel -- achieving 98.28% of oracle-best TFLOPS efficiency across 108 tested shapes.
Quick Start
1. Generate and convert benchmark data
Step 1: Generate benchmark data
python3 generate_benchmark_data.py \
--build_dir /path/to/build \
--output_dir data/fp16_original \
--dtype fp16 \
--layout rcr \
--num_build_jobs 4 \
--warmup 10 \
--repeat 50
This outputs JSON with all benchmark results.
Step 2: Convert JSON to parquet training format
python3 convert_json_to_parquet.py \
--input data/fp16_original/benchmark_results_fp16_rcr.json \
--output data/fp16_original/fp16_training_data.parquet \
--arch gfx950
The converter automatically fixes pad flags for _mem kernels and validates data.
Alternative: Parse existing logs
If you have raw benchmark logs from CK Tile:
python3 data_pipeline.py ck_tile_testrun_2.log \
-o data/gemm_universal_fp8_rcr_gfx950.parquet \
--arch gfx950 --capture_hw
2. Train a model
python3 train.py \
--data_dir data/ \
--out_dir models/gemm_universal_fp8_gfx950 \
--op gemm_universal --dtype fp8 --arch gfx950
Note: Trained models are automatically compressed to .lgbm.gz format to save space (~67% reduction). The Python tools automatically decompress them on first use and cache the decompressed version. For warm-start training, decompression happens automatically.
3. Evaluate
python3 evaluate.py \
--model_dir models/gemm_universal_fp8_gfx950 \
--data_dir data/ --op gemm_universal --dtype fp8
4. Predict the best kernel for a problem
python3 predict.py \
--model_dir models/gemm_universal_fp8_gfx950 \
--m 128 --n 1536 --k 7168 --layout rcr
5. Search for optimal configs (optional)
python3 search.py \
--model_dir models/gemm_universal_fp8_gfx950 \
--m 128 --n 1536 --k 7168 \
--strategy random --budget 500 --top_k 10
6. Using models in C++ (requires decompression)
C++ code uses the LightGBM C API which requires uncompressed .lgbm files. If you have compressed models (.lgbm.gz), decompress them first:
cd models/gemm_universal_fp16_gfx950
gunzip model_tflops.lgbm.gz
Then use in C++ examples:
cd dispatcher/build
./gemm_09_ml_heuristic --model ../heuristics/models/gemm_universal_fp16_gfx950/model_tflops.lgbm
Note: Python tools automatically decompress .lgbm.gz files on first use, so you can run Python scripts first to trigger decompression, then use the same models in C++.
Architecture
Problem (M, N, K, dtype, layout)
|
v
FeatureEngine.extract_batch() <-- 55 features: problem, kernel, interaction, hardware
|
v
LGBMRegressor.predict() <-- predicts TFLOPS for each candidate kernel
|
v
Sort by predicted TFLOPS <-- rank all candidates
|
v
Select Top-1 kernel <-- 98.28% mean efficiency, <1ms inference
Three models are trained per (op, dtype, arch):
- TFLOPS model (primary): used for kernel ranking
- Latency model (auxiliary): for latency-sensitive workloads
- Bandwidth model (auxiliary): for memory-bound analysis
File Inventory
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
generate_benchmark_data.py |
Build and run benchmarks across ~25 diverse problem sizes, output JSON |
convert_json_to_parquet.py |
Convert benchmark JSON to parquet training format, fix _mem pad flags |
data_pipeline.py |
Parse raw benchmark logs into canonical parquet datasets |
feature_engine.py |
55-feature extraction: problem, kernel, interaction, hardware profile |
train.py |
Multi-target LGBMRegressor training with GroupKFold CV, IHEM, warm-start |
predict.py |
Predictor class: predict TFLOPS/latency/bandwidth, rank kernels |
evaluate.py |
Full evaluation: global metrics, per-shape/layout/pipeline slices |
search.py |
Surrogate search: discrete DE, random top-K |
generate_wide_coverage.py |
Generate benchmark data across 706 diverse shapes |
generate_edge_dims.py |
Generate N=1, K=1, and other edge-case shapes |
DATA_GENERATION.md |
Detailed guide for building binaries and generating data |
plan.md |
Full design plan with architecture, milestones, and rationale |
Features Used (55 total)
Problem features (13)
M, N, K, split_k, log2(M), log2(N), log2(K), log2(MNK), arithmetic_intensity, aspect_ratio_mn, aspect_ratio_mk, aspect_ratio_nk, layout
Kernel features (17)
tile_m, tile_n, tile_k, warp_m, warp_n, warp_k, warp_tile_m, warp_tile_n, warp_tile_k, pipeline, scheduler, epilogue, pad_m, pad_n, pad_k, persistent, num_warps, tile_volume, tile_mn, lds_usage_estimate, lds_usage_ratio
Interaction features (9)
num_tiles_m, num_tiles_n, num_tiles_k, total_output_tiles, tile_eff_m, tile_eff_n, tile_eff_k, overall_tile_efficiency, cu_utilization
Hardware profile features (12)
hw_num_cus, hw_simds_per_cu, hw_total_simds, hw_shader_engines, hw_max_clock_mhz, hw_max_waves_per_cu, hw_wavefront_size, hw_lds_capacity, hw_l1_cache_kb, hw_l2_cache_kb, hw_l3_cache_kb, hw_num_xcd
Model Performance
fp8 RCR, gfx950
| Metric | 108 shapes (original) | 168 shapes (wide coverage) |
|---|---|---|
| Mean TFLOPS Efficiency | 98.28% | 97.51% |
| P10 TFLOPS Efficiency | 94.64% | 93.89% |
| tiny_m (M=1) Efficiency | 95.57% | 96.04% |
| R2 (TFLOPS) | 0.997 | 0.993 |
fp16 RCR, gfx950
Trained on 25 shapes, 1,024 kernels, 21,920 valid benchmarks.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Mean TFLOPS Efficiency | 99.36% |
| P10 TFLOPS Efficiency | 98.05% |
| P50 TFLOPS Efficiency | 100.00% |
| Min Efficiency | 95.45% |
| NDCG@1 | 64.00% |
| Top-5 Hit Rate | 88.00% |
Shape Family Breakdown:
| Shape Family | Mean Eff | P10 Eff | Shapes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large M (M≥1024) | 99.54% | 99.07% | 4 |
| Medium M (128≤M<1024) | 99.62% | 98.74% | 7 |
| Small M (8≤M<128) | 98.82% | 96.22% | 8 |
| Tiny M (M<8) | 99.65% | 98.96% | 6 |
Pipeline Breakdown:
| Pipeline | Mean Eff | P10 Eff |
|---|---|---|
| compv3 | 99.75% | 99.09% |
| compv4 | 99.40% | 98.54% |
| mem | 99.08% | 96.59% |
Training uses log1p(TFLOPS) as the target by default, which normalizes the
scale across shapes spanning 0.02 to 2230 TFLOPS. This was the key finding
that improved tiny-M shapes from 84% to 96% efficiency. See
LEARNINGS.md for details.
Validation
Training uses GroupKFold(n_splits=5) with group key (M, N, K) to ensure
the model is evaluated on shapes it has never seen during training. Layout is
excluded from the group key to force cross-layout generalization.
Incremental Training (Warm Start)
When new benchmark data arrives, update the model without retraining from scratch:
python3 train.py \
--data_dir data/ \
--out_dir models/v2 \
--warm_start models/gemm_universal_fp8_gfx950 \
--warm_start_n_estimators 200
This adds 200 new trees on top of the existing model. Feature schemas must match exactly (automatically enforced).
Extending to New Ops
Adding support for a new operation (e.g., gemm_streamk, grouped_conv):
- Build binaries:
ninja -C build benchmark_gemm_streamk_fp8_rcr - Subclass
FeatureEngine: add op-specific features (e.g., StreamK split factor) - Generate data: run benchmarks across diverse shapes
- Train:
python3 train.py --op gemm_streamk --dtype fp8 --data_dir data/ --out_dir models/
The training, evaluation, prediction, and search infrastructure is fully op-agnostic -- only the feature engine needs a new subclass.
Tests
102 tests covering all modules:
python3 -m pytest tests/ -v
Test coverage includes:
- Log parsing with malformed JSON, empty logs, single-kernel shapes
- Feature formula correctness (tile efficiency, LDS usage, arithmetic intensity)
- Corner-case shapes: M=1, N=1, K=1, prime dimensions, 20480x7168x256
- Batch vs single extraction parity
- Parameter space validation and projection
- Predictor: single/batch prediction, ranking, missing models, empty inputs
- Training: group keys, efficiency computation, warm-start, feature compatibility
- Search: random, DE, config validity, determinism
Documentation
- README.md: This file -- quick start, architecture, performance
- DATA_GENERATION.md: Complete guide for building tile engine binaries, running benchmarks, managing datasets, and troubleshooting
- LEARNINGS.md: Empirical findings and design decisions (log-transform, IHEM results, tiny-M analysis, feature importance, N=1/K=1 edge cases)