mirror of
https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepEP.git
synced 2026-11-05 00:47:32 +00:00
[GH-ISSUE #69] Does normal internode_dispatch/internode_combine need IBGDA in adaptive routing scenario? #66
Labels
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
deepseek-ai/DeepEP#66
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Tuvie on GitHub (Mar 12, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepEP/issues/69
I notice there was a discussion on IBGDA for test_internode, which mentioned that when AR is supported later, IBGDA is always required.
https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepEP/issues/36
I wonder why IBGDA is required in AR case.
If I still use IBRC, what kind of bug will I encounter?
Thanks
@sphish commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2025):
We previously aimed to support AR using an RDMA completion-based mechanism, which is easier to implement with IBGDA. However, we have now switched to using RDMA atomic mechanisms to support AR for normal kernels while still utilizing IBRC mode, so the earlier discussions are now outdated.
@Tuvie commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2025):
I see. Thanks for your reply.