[GH-ISSUE #3289] [Feature] Support IOS applications #1176

New issue

Open

opened 2026-10-15 18:31:45 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 0 comments

bsakaguchi commented

2026-10-15 18:31:45 +00:00

Owner

Originally created by @Am0stafa on GitHub (Oct 14, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/3289

Before submitting

I searched the open and closed issues and pull requests for a related proposal.
I understand the contribution scope must be reviewed before integration; open questions are welcome here.
This request does not include credentials, private samples, or sensitive target data.

Area

Setup, packaging, or upgrade

Current limitation

It supports APK but does it reverse engineer IOS applications?

Use cases

No response

Desired outcome and success criteria

When running on my mac I can reveser engineer an IOS application

Expected interaction with targets

Not sure yet

Target and scope details (optional)

No response

Verification available so far

Idea only; I need help defining checks

Verification details (optional)

No response

Alternatives considered

No response

Possible direction

No response

References

No response

Originally created by @Am0stafa on GitHub (Oct 14, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/3289 ### Before submitting - [x] I searched the open and closed issues and pull requests for a related proposal. - [x] I understand the [contribution scope](https://github.com/morluto/rea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#contribution-scope) must be reviewed before integration; open questions are welcome here. - [x] This request does not include credentials, private samples, or sensitive target data. ### Area Setup, packaging, or upgrade ### Current limitation It supports APK but does it reverse engineer IOS applications? ### Use cases _No response_ ### Desired outcome and success criteria When running on my mac I can reveser engineer an IOS application ### Expected interaction with targets Not sure yet ### Target and scope details (optional) _No response_ ### Verification available so far Idea only; I need help defining checks ### Verification details (optional) _No response_ ### Alternatives considered _No response_ ### Possible direction _No response_ ### References _No response_

bsakaguchi added the

triage

enhancement

labels

2026-10-15 18:31:45 +00:00

bsakaguchi referenced this issue

2026-10-17 21:09:14 +00:00

[PR #1176] [MERGED] fix(session): require an open target for session-bound native and artifact tools #2701

bsakaguchi added

enhancement

and removed

enhancement