[GH-ISSUE #6328] [Feature] C28x/C2000 support #3815

New issue

Open

opened 2026-10-31 00:44:20 +00:00 by bsakaguchi · 0 comments

bsakaguchi commented

2026-10-31 00:44:20 +00:00

Owner

Originally created by @r1ckyb0nd on GitHub (Oct 22, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/6328

Before submitting

I searched the open and closed issues and pull requests for a related proposal.
I understand the contribution scope must be reviewed before integration; open questions are welcome here.
This request does not include credentials, private samples, or sensitive target data.

Area

Native analysis or decompilation

Current limitation

It would be great if REA was able to decode C28x/C2000 firmware with Ghida.

Use cases

decoding firmware based on the C28x/C2000 framework

Desired outcome and success criteria

decodedfirmware based on the C28x/C2000 framework

Expected interaction with targets

Read existing files or captured data

Target and scope details (optional)

No response

Verification available so far

Idea only; I need help defining checks

Verification details (optional)

No response

Alternatives considered

No response

Possible direction

No response

References

No response

Originally created by @r1ckyb0nd on GitHub (Oct 22, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/6328 ### Before submitting - [x] I searched the open and closed issues and pull requests for a related proposal. - [x] I understand the [contribution scope](https://github.com/morluto/rea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#contribution-scope) must be reviewed before integration; open questions are welcome here. - [x] This request does not include credentials, private samples, or sensitive target data. ### Area Native analysis or decompilation ### Current limitation It would be great if REA was able to decode C28x/C2000 firmware with Ghida. ### Use cases decoding firmware based on the C28x/C2000 framework ### Desired outcome and success criteria decodedfirmware based on the C28x/C2000 framework ### Expected interaction with targets Read existing files or captured data ### Target and scope details (optional) _No response_ ### Verification available so far Idea only; I need help defining checks ### Verification details (optional) _No response_ ### Alternatives considered _No response_ ### Possible direction _No response_ ### References _No response_

bsakaguchi added the

triage

enhancement

labels

2026-10-31 00:44:20 +00:00

bsakaguchi referenced this issue

2026-10-31 01:10:08 +00:00

[PR #3760] fix(windows): name the missing native artifact and its recovery path on source checkouts #5879

bsakaguchi referenced this issue

2026-10-31 01:10:26 +00:00

[PR #3815] [MERGED] fix(javascript): keep recovered invalid templates dynamic in semantic effects #5919